Talk:GEO Group

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the GEO Group article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 2 months

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Miami Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Miami, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Miami metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.MiamiWikipedia:WikiProject MiamiTemplate:WikiProject MiamiMiami articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Correction and Detention Facilities (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities articles

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Kirkham, Chris (February 21, 2013). "GEO Group Wikipedia Page Controversy Erased After Football Stadium Naming Deal". Huffington Post.
Petchesky, Barry (February 21, 2013). "FAU Stadium's New Prison Sponsor Is Frantically Trying To Wipe Abuse Allegations From Wikipedia". Deadspin.

An email has been received at VRTS concerning some or all of the text on this page, and can be read as ticket:2011110210006921 by users with a VRTS account.

However, the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for the text. This may, among other reasons, be because there was no explicit release under a free license, or the email address that the permission came from is not associated with the location where the content was originally published.

For an update on the issue, please contact the user who added this template to the page, someone else with a VRTS account, or the VRT noticeboard. If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by a VRT volunteer, the text will be deleted.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 April 2019 and 7 June 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): IamCorleone34.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Migrants?

Calling them "migrant" detention centers is not accurate at all. A migrant is "a worker who moves from place to place to do seasonal work. A great number of migrant workers are in the country legally. These centers run by GEO are for those who are violating immigration law. These aren't "migrants", they're illegal immigrants. Lumping those breaking the law in with those who are largely following the law and simply working is a disservice to migrant workers and not "more accurate". Niteshift36 (talk) 16:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The best term to use would probably be "immigrant," not "migrant" or "illegal immigrant." "Immigrant" is more specific than "migrant" without necessarily using a contentious label like "illegal immigrant." According to Wiktionary, the definition of "migrant" does not specifically reference seasonal movement, only movement from one place to another; though "immigrant" is more specific, "migrant" is not inaccurate. Anaglyphic (talk) 23:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Migrant" is actually more accurate, as not all of the detained individual plan to reside permanently in the United States. The media uses the term "immigrant" more now, even if it is often incorrect especially when discussing detention centers and correctional institutions. Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 00:05, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would it really be more accurate? What percentage ever voluntarily return to residing in their home country? Niteshift36 (talk) 13:38, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it would be more accurate. We have millions of migrant workers cross the borders back and forth each year, and a not-insignificant portion (numbers vary) do not have adequate documentation. Is the term used a big deal? Probably not given that how many sources ignore the distinction. Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The term is a big deal. The people detained in these centers are not migrant workers that legally enter and return home. That lack of "adequate documentation" you soft-pedal makes their actions illegal. Lumping those people in with the migrant workers who are not breaking the law. Not to mention that some migrant workers are US citizens. Merely moving from picking oranges in FL to apples in WA to peaches in GA depending on the season won't put you in a GEO run facility. Ignoring immigration law might. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:47, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

This article presents the information in a sensible order while balancing and providing context to the topics being discussed. The information box has very descriptive information to help breakdown the insights of the company. The author did a good job of using an unbiased tone and neutrally analyzing the GEO Group. The lengths of the sections and subsections also reflect the importance of the topic and are written precisely; not adding unnecessary information, with reliable sources connected to keywords and referenced.

reverted edits

Hi @Monica Hook: and welcome to wikipedia. I've reverted your edits. Here's why. Because wikipedia strives for balance we do not allow edits made with a conflict of interest. You have made only two edits total: this one, and one where you describe yourself this way: "Monica Hook is the Vice President of Communications at GEO Care, a division of The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). For more information on GEO Group, GEO Continuum of Care and GEO Care, visit GEOGroup.com and WeAreGEO.com." Both are promotional edits. This particular page has a long history of attempted whitewashing, and the deletion of material unflattering to the company, to the point of being newsworthy -- see the tags and warnings above. I'm not saying you're part of any such historic effort. I'm just explaining -- given your employer, your job, your editing history, etc. -- why your edits were taken out. --Lockley (talk) 20:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]