Talk:GB Railfreight

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Merger proposal

We seem to have two articles running about the same company. This has come about as First GBRf has gone back to its original name of GB Railfreight.

I propose changing the First GBRf article into a redirect to GB Railfreight with a section about its ownership under the First Group.

Philphos (talk) 13:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objections to this, having 2 articles for the same company seems pointless. --Tommietomato (talk) 14:28, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on GB Railfreight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do GBRF Have BR Class 20

I have question GBFR have any British Rail Class 20 and if so what are there numbers?--I Like The british Rail Class 483 (talk) 17:10, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Class 99 locomotive order additional request.

Recently, GBRf, Beacon Rail, and Stadler Euro Dual class 99 locomotive orders have been posted.

But it's still outdated, don't you want to update it?

And the class 69 locomotive has no content and is poorly maintained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.76.112.91 (talk) 01:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]