Talk:GB-PVR

This article or section is written like an advertisement

The page has been marked as an advert. I do agree with that editor we should avoid advertisements by all means. I know this page has been written by end users. I think they have at best tried to make an objective description to make it comparable with e.g. Media Centre and MythTV. The only possibly non-objective statements I can see are in the adjectives like easy. More explicit referrals to what the editor sees as advertising statements would be helpful.
--Pz3 13:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this change turned a stub article into something that looks perfectly like a “Features” page on a program's website. Well, some of the added content seems to have been taken from GB-PVR's page.

This one has made it better, but the article still contains “fully featured”, “large user base” (without any numbers), “you” and "your" (Not sure, but I think those words don't have place in such an article. At least not all over it.)…

Also, anonymous IPs have removed the Advert template twice.

--AVRS 21:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is defunct since 2009 while it's successor NextPVR has a release in 2018... perhaps competitors are sabotaging updates... I haven't used a PVR in years and have never used either GB-PVR or NextPVR, also haven't had cable for 4 or 5 years. So, wiki should update the name and update the release... I'm not sure how to update photos without violations Tymes (talk) 05:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]