Talk:GABA receptor antagonist
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What in God's name...
[edit]"GABA receptor antagonists are good because"
Good "at", "for", "because" - no idea, perhaps just plain "unqualified good".
This is science & biochemistry not morality & philosophy. James James 173 (talk) 07:19, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Merger proposal
[edit]It is claimed that this article cannot be expanded to a traditionally non-stub length without creating significant redundancy in the GABA and Receptor antagonist pages.
Therefore, it should be merged with a subsection of at least one of those articles to avoid unnecessary division of content.
The specifics of the merger are left unspecified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevia badger (talk • contribs) 19:17, 13 May 2013 (UTC)