Talk:G20 developing nations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information

The article doesnt discuss what exactly constitutes membership, or how members join or leave. And how exactly did "Brazil, India and South Africa decide to articulate their initiatives of trade liberalization"? This statement is hard to understand to a casual reader. Can someone help fill out this article?

map and members

This map needs updating to reflect the current situation which I'll do when I get time if no one else does first. I've changed the label for now; although it has Malaysia coloured in on it and I can find no reference to Malaysia having been a member in the past. I think it ought to reflect the current situation on the map but it would be good if we had a definite list of the 'former members' as well. Iancaddy 15:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The map has only part of Malaysia colored in which is even stranger. Yanksta x 21:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Uruguay is not colored on the map but is listed in the infobox. --chemica 23:01, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Updated. --Cat out 01:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol?

What does [...] mean? --Shanedidona 22:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The three dots are an ellipsis. They indicate that the user of the quote removed some of the original languge. In MLA style, ellpsis are offset by brackets to show that they where added my writer of the current text and not from the original source. --chemica 22:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

G20 or G-20?

This page needs to refer to the group as either the G20 or the G-20, but not both. I was about to change them all to G20, but the URI of the cited site says G-20... --Rob W 17:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:G20.jpg

Image:G20.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is interesting! But not sure! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.119.61.6 (talk) 17:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC) BetacommandBot (talk) 06:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Netherlands in G-20 developing nations?

24. Netherlands? I doubt it. 58.9.121.62 (talk) 04:21, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed reference to 'G4 Bloc'

For some time, this article stated that:

The core leadership of the G-20, known as the G4 bloc, consists of Brazil, China, India, and South Africa.

But no references for this, and I can't find any significant mention of it in major publications.
Earthlyreason (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Homepage?

The link titled "G20 Homepage" is dead. Googling, I couldn't find their website anywhere. Do they have one? Is it just down right now, maybe? Actually, the number of relevant hits to G20 Developing Nations and variations over that is very low. I just (unsigned) corrected the current list of members, based on 1 of the links given here, backed up by other secondary sources - if the G20 Developing Nations actually have no website of their own, that is quite bad for them. Just pointing it out, really. Hazlzz (talk) 03:54, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ya the homepage does not exist. I am removing it. Eliaskurian (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on G20 developing nations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060825135001/http://www.g-20.mre.gov.br:80/history.asp to http://www.g-20.mre.gov.br/history.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on G20 developing nations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051201100335/http://commerce.nic.in/wto_sub/g20/pressrel.htm to http://commerce.nic.in/wto_sub/g20/pressrel.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]