Talk:G. Sudhakaran

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

India: Kerala / Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Moved annonym (from ip address: 117.97.18.251) comments from the main page

He faces criticisms from all type of people in kerala. The following is an extract of criticism widely circulated across Kerala Medias.

G . Sudhakaran ( Minister of Dewaswom in Kerala State ) is talking about the entry of Women in Sabarimala Temple and wearing of Churidar in Guruvaroor temple in every function he participates; be it a CPI(M) conference or inauguration of Fish Market. In what capacity he is making all these statements ?

Who has given him such a license ? The dress code in temples and its rituals are not with in the ambit of a Minister. He can not intervene in such matters. Hindu Temples are neither department nor a corporation of of Government.

Historically these temples are being administered by Hindu Kings. When democratic Government was installed they took over these temples by force. Now the Government is headed by Communist leaders who have no faith in religion.

The why they are muddling in the running of Hindu temples. Is it secular ? Why they are in control of Hindu Temples only ?. Why the Government not interfering in the activities of Christian and Muslim Churches and Mosques ?.

The argument for allowing women entry in Sabarimala was that under Indian Constitution all are equal. Then , is that Constitution not applicable to Muslims? Will Mr. Sudhakaran argue for entry of Women in Muslim Mosques? Will he argue for wearing Churidars instead of Black Purdha for Muslim ladies ? If he does all these then it can be accepted.

But in the present ; there are two standard, one for Hindus and other for other united Religions. It cant be accepted in Secular India. Justice should be equal irrespective of religion. By muddling only in the Hindu beliefs , Mr. Sudhakaran and his team is playing pseudo secularism.

It cant be allowed any more. Hindus are not donkeys. Sudhakaran and his camp fears the religion of Muslim and Christian only because they are UNITED.

Its time for Hindus too to UNITE and protect our culture and rituals. Then only secular India will have a meaning.

It appears that there is some point in the above arguments.

The issue about the unity or disunity of a community should not be discussed in a space like Web media. This is not a political forum. Regarding Kerala Politics, Mr.Sudhakaran is always a talking point. Whether one likes him or not, is not a matter of wikipedia. I feel some more details can be included not viewpoints. This is a space for information not for political transformation. (Ashrafmedia (talk) 21:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]