Talk:G-spot/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Torchiest (talk | contribs) 02:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to have to quick fail this nomination, unfortunately. It has a citation needed tag in the lead which has been there for a couple months without any attempt to fix it. The tag is placed after a statement about the location of the G-spot. Further down in the article, in the location section, the statement about location is repeated, without a citation. The second part of that sentence has a claim about G-spot stimulation causing a more intense orgasm, but the cite for that claim is a dead link. Finally, there is a dubious-discuss tag in the Skene's Gland section which has been there for a couple months as well. Based on these issues, I think the page will need some more work before it is ready for a proper good article review. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 02:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch, sorry about those, will fix. - Roy Boy 06:44, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]