Talk:Günther Specht/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- if: Need to explain what II./JG 11 and 5./JG 11 mean when they first appear. Probably best done as a note. Explain Geschwaderkommodore. Done
- This is currently done in the main body, but not in the lead. Please explain the terms there and delete the links and explanations in the main body to avoid duplication and overlinking.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC) Done
- if: Need to explain what II./JG 11 and 5./JG 11 mean when they first appear. Probably best done as a note. Explain Geschwaderkommodore. Done
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail: