Talk:Génesis Carmona

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Venezuela Mid‑importance

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ameliach

There is no credible link between Ameliach's tweet and Carmona's death. Can we just stop with this nonsense?Riothero (talk) 15:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am just putting what is in the sources. La Patilla reported that some posters were being placed calling him a "murderer" and called Genesis a victim. So it does involve Genesis and it has been reported in many sources that her death happened after Ameliach called upon UBCH members in Carabobo.--Zfigueroa (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This issue touches on a reason I believe your edits are perceived as biased. Not only do you rely constantly on an opposition news website, lapatilla.com (the reliability of which, as a source, contrary to what you might think, is still in dispute), you seem to regard each of its news items (even items consisting merely of allegations, partisan coverage) as worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia. Not all (esp. unsubstantiated, non-notable) allegations, rumors, conspiracy theories deserves mention in an encyclopedia.Riothero (talk) 02:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I can agree with you on this. Just one of the main goals of WP is getting every detail. I just saw it on a lot of websites.--Zfigueroa (talk) 09:37, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Génesis Carmona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20140219175059/http://www.el-nacional.com/sucesos/Solicitan-donantes-Miss-Turismo-Valencia_0_358764191.html to http://www.el-nacional.com/sucesos/Solicitan-donantes-Miss-Turismo-Valencia_0_358764191.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Génesis Carmona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]