Talk:Future food technology

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Food patch plasters

I cannot find refs for this in English, this may be a hoax. A search for C. Patrick Dann reveals very little hits and they appear to be copies of wiki content. I have removed this section as a possible hoax ([1]). --Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 07:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Split

I am not sure if 'Future food technology' is a notable topic in itself. Maybe the article just needs a better title, or maybe we should just merge the sections into subarticles and delete it? --Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 07:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than split, I am going to merge this into food technology if no one objects. I plan to create a new section titled 'emerging technologies' or something similar.Dialectric (talk) 02:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Editor

I am in a dispute with a new editor. This editor keeps adding a section that reads more like a college essay than actual encylopedic knowledge. In addition by claiming better food is organic is POV. In addition this article is about Future of food technology, current eating habits of the French do not fall within the scope of this article.--VViking_TalkEdits 13:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Single purpose account continuing to revert edits back to the the issues mentioned above. I'm trying to take this to the talk page but the editor with whom I have a dispute with is not engaging.--VViking_TalkEdits 13:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]