Jump to content

Talk:Futuna Island, Vanuatu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Futuna Island, Vanuatu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melanesian ?

[edit]

So says info box , yet the main text states it’s Polynesian ..???WisDom-UK (talk) 23:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It gets complicated - the language spoken, Futuna-Aniwa is definitely Polynesian, but by descent, the islanders are probably 'more Melanesian than Polynesian', though the distinctions between the two are rather arbitrary. People have been travelling between the south Pacific islands for millennia, and doing all the things that people do when they meet others there, so trying to decide who is 'what' is a fools' errand. They are who they are, and if they don't easily fit outsider's classifications, that isn't their problem. If the article is going to comment on this, it should explain it better. And cite a source. 109.157.75.5 (talk) 08:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]