Talk:Futarasan shrine

Japan: Shinto High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 08:46, November 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Shinto task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Historic sites Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Futarasan jinja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130517061440/http://eos.kokugakuin.ac.jp/modules/xwords/images/uploads/EOS070712Ab.pdf to http://eos.kokugakuin.ac.jp/modules/xwords/images/uploads/EOS070712Ab.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Futarasan jinja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929000758/http://www.tochigi-jinjacho.or.jp/jinjalist/futarasan.html to http://www.tochigi-jinjacho.or.jp/jinjalist/futarasan.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Phallic mountain??

I am baffled by the text in the #History_of_the_shrine section, purportedly from the 1993 book Cambridge History of Japan, page 524, stating that:

The mountain ... has the shape of the phallic stone rods found in pre-agricultural Jōmon sites.

How is the shape of the mountain even remotely phallic? None of the photographs in the article show this, nor does any map that I've seen. I don't have access to the Cambridge History of Japan and cannot confirm if the given source actually makes this claim, nor how they explain this.

Interestingly, I find no mention of phallic-ness in any of the monolingual Japanese sources I've just looked into, including:

JA WP article for Mt. Nantai at ja:男体山
JA WP article for Futarasan Jinja at ja:二荒山神社
Kotobank page for https://kotobank.jp/word/%E7%94%B7%E4%BD%93%E5%B1%B1-108859

Includes content from Encyclopedia Nipponica, Encyclopedia Brittanica (Japanese edition), Mypedia, Shogakukan's Nihon Kokugo Daijiten, Digital Daijisen, Dictionary of Japanese Heritage Sites, Dictionary of Japanese Tourism Resources, Sekai Dai Hyakka Jiten.

Where these sources describe the name of the mountain at all, they explain that the "man body" name arose from association between this mountain and another nearby mountain as a pair, with one called 女体山 (Nyotai-san, literally "woman body mountain") and the other called 男体山 (Nantai-san, literally "man body mountain"). There's nothing about genitalia or phallicness.

Even should the Cambridge History of Japan clearly state a claim that the mountain has a phallic shape, we need some further explanation -- visually, objectively, the mountain is not phallic in shape at all. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 19:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]