Talk:Fujitsu Siemens Computers

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Quality problems

Late Fujitsu-Siemens computers were widely known for their bad quality, although I can't cite any definitive sources. Shouldn't this be included in the article somehow? This might have been a factor in Fujitsu's buyout of Siemens. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.67.128.160 (talk) 20:26, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's a completely unfounded claim. I own and operate two different FUJITSU-SIEMENS computers, an Esprimo E5600 and a P5615, from 2005 and 2006 respectively, and never had any trouble with them. -- Alexey Topol (talk) 11:21, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality

It seems to me just better to designate Fujitsu Siemens Computers B.V. as a "Dutch company", rather than German and Japanese: those are only the nationalities of the company's owners, but the company itself is headquartered in the Netherlands (and also legally chartered there, I believe).

Fujitsu Siemens is only for tax reasons based in the Netherlands. The factories and R&D centers are in Augsburg, Sömmerda, Paderborn (all Germany) and one in the US I think. 138.246.7.106 (talk) 11:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Japanese board members?--87.162.62.194 (talk) 18:39, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell is their stock symbol? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.42.84.134 (talk) 21:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked it out on many websites and the symbol is only mentioned as Fujitsu, it doesn't precisely tell you what the stock symbol is. SKYNET X7000 (talk) 16:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicts of Interest

Tons of new accounts with 0 edits are constantly adding spam for this company. Ridernyc 13:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which ones are the links so that it can be removed SKYNET X7000 (talk) 16:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Executive Management

This part is totally copy&paste from the company´s website! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.135.79.81 (talk) 20:23, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fujitsu Siemens Computers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090828183719/http://www.thestandard.com/news/2007/11/08/fujitsu-siemens-goes-seriously-green to http://www.thestandard.com/news/2007/11/08/fujitsu-siemens-goes-seriously-green

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]