Talk:Fucking A
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
[edit]Ok, so I'm pretty damn sure "Abortionist" is not the right term. Edited. Deal. Halfpinthipster (talk) 23:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
"Abortionist" is the term used in the play. This article needs serious edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScaryMara (talk • contribs) 12:35, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Cleanup
[edit]This article needs POV phrasing removed, html replaced by wiki markup, elimiantion of lists, some more thrird party RS. There is overeliance on a few pages in one book. Jezhotwells (talk) 08:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Problem
[edit]This article feels like it's written as an advertisement. DudeWithAFeud (talk) 21:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Or a clumsy humanities essay. Consider "without a doubt largely an expressionism piece because of its own characteristics". First, "without doubt" - if so, these words can be omitted, if not, they are inexact; and so the phrase rings false. Second, "its own characteristics" is pleonastic, as it can only mean exactly the same as a simple "its characteristics" 137.205.100.45 (talk) 07:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)