Talk:Fuck Them All/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: — Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

The lead section doesnot conform to WP:LEAD. Please extend it. For such a large article, it should be atleast three paras.
No internal wikilink in the infobox please per WP:IBX.
No album tracklisting.
The pink background in the Music and lyrics section just looks plain cheap and highlt unencyclopedic.
The video image needs trimming of the black borders.
You have a section named Critical reception, then inside it you have Chart performance, why and how are they related?
Release history is a miscellaneous info and comes at the bottom of the page. + its unsourced
The official version table looks a complete mess. I could not even understand any thing clearly and why is it exactly needed and why are these versions not in the tracklisting section?
Sales is from Farmer's official website and fails reliability.
File:Fuck Them All.jpg, not enough rationale.
File:Fuck Them All (video).jpg, not enough rationale.
There is no sample of the song, so that the reader can understand what the article and the music section is talking about.
Prose:
- I'm pretty sure another thorough copyedit is needed, although one was done by the GOCE. But then that doesnot explain existence of prose loosenings, some of which I will list.
  - In spite of some success on the French and Belgian (Wallonia) charts, where it reached number two – the album's best-selling charting – the song received mixed reviews and was generally deemed a disappointment. --> Goes in a total roundabout way.
  - Teh music video section. Pretty much sums up what I feel because sentences are coming without any previous conjencture, like "Nearby there is a trapped short-haired woman with a flayed face and crow-like eyes"
  - "Certified Silver by the Syndicat National de l'Édition Phonographique two months after being released,[43] "Fuck Them All" was the 70th best-selling single of 2005." --> There wasn't any mention of the shipments, except a reference to Farmer's official site.

Overall I would say that the work is good, there is pretty much everything needed to make it a GA, just that there is a huge arrangement and design problem. The overall look feels pretty haphazard, and doesnot flow well. I would strongly recommend going through FA song articles like "4 Minutes", and recent GAs like "When Love Takes Over", "Bad Romance" etc. It just seems too much of work needed at present to even put it on hold. Go through a peer review and then re-nominate again. This is a regretful failing, as I know Europe22 is a wonderful editor. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:58, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]