Talk:Fubonn Shopping Center

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fubonn Shopping Center article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Shopping Centers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Low importance?

Not sure why this would be categorized as of low importance to the WikiOregon project - the Asian population in the state is significant and the largest Asian mall, anchored by a large Asian grocery and in the "new Chinatown" area of Portland, seems like something worthy of the Mid importance status. "This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia." vs "This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas." The latter seems much more appropriate to me. Thanks for the edits but the abscence of an article on Fubonn seemed like a meaningful oversight to me and the shopping center is an important part of contemporary Oregon's culture, I'd argue. Marshallkirkpatrick (talk) 07:26, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just edited it to Mid importance. I don't mean to be a jerk about it and if my argument doesn't hold up to the process, let me know, but barring reason to act otherwise, I'm going to take the liberty to change that. The 2nd place 1916 Oregon Ducks football team's stub article is judged a mid and this certainly seems more important to me. Marshallkirkpatrick (talk) 07:37, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blog post about the creation of this article

The first author of this article wrote a blog post about his experience creating the article: http://marshallk.com/what-i-learned-from-a-night-editing-wikipedia Hashar (talk) 08:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fubonn Shopping Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101228195612/http://www.portlandtribune.com/news/story.php?story_id=31302 to http://www.portlandtribune.com/news/story.php?story_id=31302

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]