Talk:Frozen (franchise)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:19, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Quick review this time → quick fail per WP:GAFAIL -- "It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria [and] it has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid." Here's some more detail:

You, the nominator (@Glacier Editor), have not made a single edit to this article. Now that's not why I'm failing it but I wanted to point that out.
For one, the lead can be expanded to at least 3 paragraphs since it's a big franchise.
#History has a valid expansion banner that should be fixed.
A lot of sections/paragraphs have unsourced content.
The image in #Activities needs a caption (small detail).
#Parades is just "On [date], [event]", failing WP:TRAILER.
Most of #Events_and_celebrations lacks sources.
Citations are kinda wack (a lot of WP:BARELINKS don't pass GA).
...and most importantly, a lot of sources are unreliable.

TheStreet.com, New York Post, PR Newswire to name a few

Overall, this article needs a lot of work/expansion to make it acceptable for GA so I'm quick-failing it for now. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:19, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]