Talk:Frontal release sign

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the brain, nerves and nervous system.

Medicine: Neurology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

COI question:-

This page and the palmomental reflex page were based on content that is featured on a website with which I have a COI ( http://www.asktheneurologist.com/primitive-reflexes.html ).

I would like to hear opinions re referencing this page either on the frontal release sign page, palmomental reflex page or both.

TIA Sanjpatel1 (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Presently there are no sources at all. The problem with the Asktheneurologist page is, that it is hardly longer and essentially duplicate to the Wikipedia page, and contains no primary references either. The videos are nice. JFW | T@lk 17:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I think there may be value in adding an external link on the PMR page only, for the purpose of viewing the method of elicitation of the reflex and a positive response. Do you think that would be acceptable?

I agree that the text content adds little and can be incorporated into the wiki pages.

PS The reference issue has been addressed by asktheneurologist

Thanks again Sanjpatel1 (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should turn asktheneurologist into a wiki :-)

I will leave a message on WT:MED to ask other contributors for their opinion. JFW | T@lk 20:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that the WT:MED thread has been removed without any objections lodged so I guess a link from the PMR page to the video should not be controversial. Thanks for help and advice JFW. :-) Sanjpatel1 (talk • contribs )

OK. JFW | T@lk 21:31, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]