Talk:Frog cake/GA1

GA Review

Hello, I will be reviewing this article for Good Article candidacy. Those things look so tasty! Check back soon for a review. I wonder if GA reviewers should make a rule that we must try the tasty treats as extra incentive for reviewing them... ;) CarpetCrawler (talk) 01:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a good rule. In which case I'll volunteer to review Deep-fried mars bar. :) - Bilby (talk) 01:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhhh, if only I could do the same thing without putting on a ton of pounds! :)

This article very easily passes the GA criteria. Although it is short, I understand that a ton of information will more than likely not be found on the subject, especially since it's only a food subject. I only ask for you to do one thing before this can pass.

"On the minus side, the success of the frog cake has led to imitations, so in 2001 Balfours registered both the name and the shape of the product as a trademark." - "On the minus side" is too POV-ish, I recommend that you correct that sentence. It really won't even take too long, and this article is on hold until this HUGE GIGANTIC ENORMOUS edit is done. ;) Send me a message on my talkpage when you finish! CarpetCrawler (talk) 00:51, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. It took a lot of work, but extensive research to fix the wording was the key. :) btw, I was wondering about the size too, so I checked some of the other food articles - in this case I figured that there wasn't really anything left to say. - Bilby (talk)

OK, the article can pass now... except you must give me 1,000 of those tasty looki... I mean, nevermind. The article has passed, great job! :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]