Talk:Froberg mutiny

Malta Low‑importance

	Malta portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malta on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaltaWikipedia:WikiProject MaltaTemplate:WikiProject MaltaMalta articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Balkan / British / European / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

A fact from Froberg mutiny appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 June 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Froberg mutiny ended after mutineers blew up Fort Ricasoli's gunpowder magazine?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Froberg mutiny.

Wikipedia

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 12, 2018, April 12, 2019, April 12, 2023, and April 12, 2024.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Froberg mutiny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151115113200/http://www.militaryarchitecture.com/Arx/arx1_4_2008.pdf to http://www.militaryarchitecture.com/Arx/arx1_4_2008.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "In popular culture" section

This article's In popular culture section (which mentioned the book Ricasoli Soldier by Joe Scicluna) was recently removed by Kintetsubuffalo (talk · contribs), stating that it is a "promotional addition of non-notable work, non-reliable source". I had added the section, and it's not promotional since I have absolutely no affiliation with the book or its author. I'm not sure regarding notability, but I think it's worth mentioning a fictional adaptation of a historic event on an article about the event. Can Kintetsubuffalo (talk · contribs) please elaborate why the review in The Malta Independent is an unreliable source? What are other users' opinions on the matter? --Xwejnusgozo (talk) 13:34, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]