Talk:Frequently Asked Questions About Time Travel
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
soundtrack
[edit]note on Slippin & slidin by Rendle
the full credit from the film is:
Slippin & Slidin
Written by Rendle
Publishing Copyright Control
Licensed by kind permission of
Will Rendle c/o Twenty Four Seven
Music Management Ltd.
between that and the track name here: https://tidal.com/browse/track/37990919
it makes me think that it's Will Rendle (but not one that's on wikipedia yet) not a band called rendle
https://tidal.com/browse/artist/6239438, but i'm not sure about "performed by" being accurate
Untitled
[edit]the Plot needed to be finished, do I just go in and write it? Or do I have to do anything special? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.184.127 (talk) 21:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- I have a rough draft of the plot summary, I didn't have time to finish it though so I just saved what I had at the time. You are welcome to add your own plot summary but if you don't I'll get around to it sooner or later. Keep in mind that if the plot summary exceeds 700 words the deletionists will cut it to shreds, apparently the target is 400-700 words which isn't all that much.
- To sign your comments put -- ~~~~ at the end and wikipedia will convert it into your name and (if you are logged in) or just your IP address and the date. -- Horkana (talk) 02:33, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Length of plot summary
[edit]As Horkana warned some deletionist put a "too long note" above the plot summary, then presumably somebody else completely shredded the plot summary while leaving the "too long note" intact. Are three paragraphs of crap really too much for the summary? The earlier version might have been too long, but there should be some kind of "goldilocks length" with adequate description of the movie's content. [[[Special:Contributions/80.133.111.107|80.133.111.107]] (talk) 21:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)]
Weasel words
[edit]I don't know who put them there, but there are a few instances of weaselword references when there are none. I deleted the instances, if anyone thinks it does have meaning, please explain why before putting them there. --93.125.198.182 (talk) 16:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
sequel
[edit]what is the information on a sequal for the story? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.81.227.48 (talk) 23:20, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- See here. (Emperor (talk) 02:19, 4 November 2012 (UTC))
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Frequently Asked Questions About Time Travel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111103061435/http://www.close-upfilm.com/reviews/f/FAQ_about_time_travel.html to http://www.close-upfilm.com/reviews/f/FAQ_about_time_travel.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Plot Section
[edit]I know that in the past there was a more thorough plot summary that got shredded, but the version that was there now was not only woefully incomplete, there were things in it that were just wrong.
If it needs to be paired down, okay, but this movie's plot is actually pretty complex - with subtle references and foreshadowing - that really can't be captured in 3-4 short paragraphs. So please do not remove large chunks without adequately summarizing what is within them.
And in case anyone who hasn't seen the movie wonders why I felt the need to include the various hair colors of Anna Faris in the film, it is contextual. It's one of the in-jokes of the movie, that Anna's hair starts out in a color/style you'd almost never see on her, but when she appears at the end of the film she's back to her natural (one might even say signature) hair color and style. CleverTitania (talk) 06:52, 11 July 2018 (UTC)