Jump to content

Talk:French submarine Mariotte/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 20:00, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Anything you could add to clarify what the drop collars are for non-experts? I don't think we have a link, unfortunately.
    I wish that I did, nothing beyond the name in any of my sources.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    I'd assume the patrols off Provence were to defend against an attack by Goeben/Breslau?
    Probably, but uncertain since her logbook covering this time was lost with the boat.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    File:MARIOTTE xxx 1a.jpg - is there a better source for this? I didn't see anything on the forum that said it was from a postcard (though I didn't look very hard)
    Replaced with a scan of the postcard.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    File:Franse-duikboot-WO-I.jpg - needs a source
    Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]