Talk:French ironclad Océan/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 21:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- 'Océan was a wooden-hulled, armored frigate built for the French Navy in the mid to late 1860s, the lead ship of her class.' - 'and the lead ship of her class'
- 'Late in the ship's career four above-water 356-millimeter (14.0 in) torpedo tubes were added.' - Merge to previous paragraph to get rid of fragment sentence
- Done and done.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Do we know why she was recalled from the blockade?
- The entire squadron was recalled.
- Do we know why she was recalled from the blockade?
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
A small article that would seem to be as comprehensive as it can be about a ship that essentially did very little. A few points and it can be passed. Skinny87 (talk) 08:42, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review.