Talk:French ironclad La Galissonnière/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 15:58, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
wl Occupation of Tunisia and the Sino-French War
Both are linked in the lede.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Need the usual footnote on ironclads.
Done

And that sentence on why it may have taken so long to build.
Done.

Are there any expanded details on what she did during the Battle of Fuzhou?
Probably, let me look around.
Added.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:51, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

It's nice to see an article on an ironclad that manages to find some specific details of what they did during combat campaigns. Some additions and alterations are needed, and then this can be passed. Skinny87 (talk) 15:58, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, excellent. Well, you know what happens now...Skinny87 (talk) 19:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]