Talk:French ironclad Gauloise/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 04:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
I will do this one. Comments to follow.
Infobox
- There is a surplus bracket on the main armament.
Design and description
- Ever so slight discrepancy in PS between description and infobox.
- PS is the abbreviation for metric horsepower
- There is also a switch between terminology here: nominal horsepower and PS - not sure if that is deliberate?
- Two different things. Nominal was based on the bore and stroke of the engine, but PS was an actual measurement of power.
- Ever so slight discrepancy in thickness of the conning tower sides between description and infobox.
Construction and service
- Discrepancy in launch date between description and infobox
- Is there a link for Northern Squadron? Would also apply to its mention in lead
- No link yet.
- ...many of the trained gunners aboard the squadron... suggest: "...many of the trained gunners aboard the squadron's ships..."
- link Mediterranean Squadron
- Linked in the lede
Other stuff
- Image tags check out OK. A suggestion though; swap the images. I think it is better to have the image of the actual ship in the infobox rather than her sister. But that may be a personal preference and it won't affect this review if you choose not to.
- No dupe links
- The dablinks/external links tools don't want to work for me but on a manual check, the external links in the references check out OK
That's all I found on my first run through. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 04:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- I see one suggestion not effected, but that is pretty minor and not enough to hold this up. Passing as GA as I believe it meets the GA criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)