Talk:French cruiser Lalande/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 16:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

1. Prose On hold

2. Verifiability ✓ Pass

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations ✓ Pass

7. Miscellaneous On hold

Comments

1.

Consider linking reserve in the lead to Reserve fleet where you're talking about the ship status, not the specific fleet
- Done
"and she had provisions to carry up to 150 naval mines" - Maybe it's an English variant thing, but provisions seems really weird to me in this context
- Switched to "capacity"

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Add a short description
- Doesn't Wikidata do that automatically? I confess I don't know much about Wikidata or short descriptions, though.
  - Wikidata item is under a different title and is not linked to this article. [1]. I'll go ahead and add it manually here.
Consider adding alt text for the images. It's not a requirement for GA-status but helps with accessibility/screen readers and is often asked for in ACR and FAC.
- Added one for the lead image, but I don't know what exactly is useful info for the map. Any ideas?
  - Not sure. Since it's not a requirement for GA, that can just be left alone. Hog Farm (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's it. This article is in really good shape. The two points under 7. aren't mandatory, but are things that would be helpful additions to the article. Hog Farm (talk) 20:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for another review! Parsecboy (talk) 16:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]