Talk:French cruiser Amiral Aube

French cruiser Amiral Aube has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 16, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Amiral Aube/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 02:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

1. Prose On hold

2. Verifiability On hold

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations ✓ Pass

7. Miscellaneous On hold

Comments

1.

"was a one of five Gloire-class armored cruisers " - I don't think "a" is necessary
" two singe-gun wing turrets" - I'm not particularly familiar with naval warfare, so I can't tell if "singe-gun" is a term I'm not familiar or a typo for "single"
Maybe I'm just missing something, but I'm struggling to find where the 174mm armor thickness for the barbettes is reflected in the prose
Infobox says it was laid down on 9 August 1899, prose says February 1901. The 1899 date appears to be the order date.
Infobox gives completion date of 17 April 1904, prose gives 1 April 1904
No need to link Canada per MOS:OVERLINK
"and she had required frequent repairs until she was sent to Brest for a refit in March 1916." - Not sure that "had" is necessary
Link Brest in the prose, most North American readers don't have a great grasp of French geography

2.

Generally Wordpress isn't a great source, but since it just seems to be hosting a primary source report, it's accessable, since the report is reliable and I'm assuming good faith that the Canada At War Blog properly posted the contents of the report. If a better hosting of the content is available, I'd recommend using that before taking this article to ACR or FAC.
I'm not seeing where the "French Cruiser Sully" from the references is cited at all. If it's not used, move to further reading.
The EL redirects to a home page, repair or remove.
Is there an OCLC, ISBN, or ISSN available for Kennan?

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Add a short description

That's it, placing on hold. Hog Farm (talk) 03:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This just goes to show the value of a second pair of eyes. Many thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]