Talk:Frei Caneca
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Thinker78, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on July 2018. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Needs additional citations for verification. |
Untitled
[edit]I am pushing my limited Portuguese skills to the limit. If there are people more fluent than me, please feel free to translate more parts from the Portuguese Wikipedia. Thanks! Eladynnus (talk)
Syth
[edit]Please do not syth sources, that constitutes WP:OR. Tamsier (talk) 16:09, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I also find it hard to believe a Brazilian travel website [1] was used to source his death. Is this subject notable enough to warrant a stand alone article? Checked the corresponding Port article that was also tagged with its one inline citation [2]. Will do more research on this.Tamsier (talk) 16:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Somehow I doubt you will, since you never followed up on your pledge to "raise this issue" with the Fr. and Pt. editors about the contents of their versions of the peasant leagues articles. Eladynnus (talk) 17:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- You mean this [3]? Oh I've tagged it [4] too. Noticed that Portuguese wiki has already tagged it as well so there was no need for me to tag it. Unlike you if I say something I do it. You are the one who created this poorly sourced and syth article, not to mention creating a full article based on one source / filled with dubious claims. No matter how much you insult me in other talk pages, that doesn't change the fact that you are poor "editor", POV Pusher, disruptive and a vandal. I was thinking of semi-retiring due to personal commitments but will drop by from time to time because I don't trust your "edits". I say edits with hesitation because you don't edit you vandalize. Your disruptions and vandals had made me go through your edits. Lord behold, your edits are full of WP:OR, one source etc. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Tamsier (talk) 19:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I see that that article was tagged only a few days ago; I checked it back in July, when you first said you'd do it. I invite you to tell me where my original research is and I also ask you to respond to me at Talk:Roog, Talk:List of African words in Jamaican Patois, and User_talk:Tamsier#Tempplate_problem as you have completely dropped out of those discussions.Eladynnus (talk) 20:52, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I decided to ignore you as I have told you before. Your main purpose is to waste my time, vandalise and disrupt wiki. You don't deserve my time. Tamsier (talk) 21:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- If you're going to say all these things about me then the least you could do is explain how I am a vandal, POV pusher, etc, or else just report me to someone. Eladynnus (talk) 21:37, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I decided to ignore you as I have told you before. Your main purpose is to waste my time, vandalise and disrupt wiki. You don't deserve my time. Tamsier (talk) 21:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I see that that article was tagged only a few days ago; I checked it back in July, when you first said you'd do it. I invite you to tell me where my original research is and I also ask you to respond to me at Talk:Roog, Talk:List of African words in Jamaican Patois, and User_talk:Tamsier#Tempplate_problem as you have completely dropped out of those discussions.Eladynnus (talk) 20:52, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- You mean this [3]? Oh I've tagged it [4] too. Noticed that Portuguese wiki has already tagged it as well so there was no need for me to tag it. Unlike you if I say something I do it. You are the one who created this poorly sourced and syth article, not to mention creating a full article based on one source / filled with dubious claims. No matter how much you insult me in other talk pages, that doesn't change the fact that you are poor "editor", POV Pusher, disruptive and a vandal. I was thinking of semi-retiring due to personal commitments but will drop by from time to time because I don't trust your "edits". I say edits with hesitation because you don't edit you vandalize. Your disruptions and vandals had made me go through your edits. Lord behold, your edits are full of WP:OR, one source etc. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Tamsier (talk) 19:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Somehow I doubt you will, since you never followed up on your pledge to "raise this issue" with the Fr. and Pt. editors about the contents of their versions of the peasant leagues articles. Eladynnus (talk) 17:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I also find it hard to believe a Brazilian travel website [1] was used to source his death. Is this subject notable enough to warrant a stand alone article? Checked the corresponding Port article that was also tagged with its one inline citation [2]. Will do more research on this.Tamsier (talk) 16:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)