Talk:Freestyle nunchaku
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Freestyle nunchaku article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 October 2006. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Freestyle nunchaku be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
(untitled)
[edit]One major problem here, wikipedia articles cannot contain instruction. See Wp:not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information point 8. --Xyzzyplugh 13:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
started to rewrite... this may take some time as I have no idea what im doing yet! --Hairybiddy 18:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Wikified
[edit]Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! I've formatted the opening paragraph, sectioned the information, cleaned up some of the tone, etc. More work is still needed. Categorization is also needed. I will also weigh in with a weak Keep on the AfD page. JubalHarshaw 15:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
rewrite
[edit]I added a referance once I worked out how to do it as a result of the comments on the delete discussion, its relevance as a proper competitive sport should help it stay around here for a little while I hope. It does definatly need work though. When I get time I will try and get more involved in wikipedia and improve it..Hairybiddy 00:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
removed mass of information to make it more wikiesq, plan is to just add descriptions of particular moves not found in traditional nunchaku rather than amassing a huge list of all possible techniques which was attempted before Hairybiddy 23:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
categories
[edit]activities using a weapon makes the category "weapons" valid.. Well thats what I reckon. Please feel free to suggest a more suitable category if you wish... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hairybiddy 20:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Martial arts as a category is too broad - please see how it is arranged. I changed it to the Stickfighting sub category - perhaps Hybrid martial arts would also be good since you are using a Chinese weapon and Japanese terms.Peter Rehse 00:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
content
[edit]Should there really be a list of people from the Freestyle forum? Is it really necessary? And to HairyBiddy, you should remember to close your tags. Just typing "small" in between <> will shrink all the text after it unless you close it.- Ambiesushi
Thanks for the note re: tags I don't remember when I did that but thanks for fixing. I should know better really :-) I actually agree with your thoughts on the matter with regard to the above point, I don't believe it is necessary. Hairybiddy (talk) 14:57, 19 May 2011 (UTC)