Talk:Freemasonry in South Africa

Freemasonry Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article needs reworking

This article needs to be completely reworked. It is very badly written and has many inaccuracies. The citations are also poor. I'll try to fix some of this. Pepe Oats (talk) 05:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if it would be possible, and worthwhile, to split the article into a "Freemasonry in South Africa" article, and a "Grandlodge of South Africa" article. Pepe Oats (talk) 14:52, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grandmasters

Barry Ne, I might be mistaken, but I think you have conflated thr office of Worshipful Master of the Good Hope lodge with the District Grand Master National. This is an easy mistake to make, do to the similar titles, but one is a grand lodge level office with the ability to issue warrants and has authority over the lodges in a district, while one only has authority over a particular lodge. Pepe Oats (talk) 18:43, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nelson Mandela

Barry Ne, I see that you have deleted Nelson Mandela from the list of South African freemasons. I did, contrary to your explanation, supply a reliable source. (The MWPHGL of North Carolina's official history). Seeing that you've included other individuals on the list you don't have any mention outside of anti-masonic christian fringe papers, I don't see the issue in including someone who the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of North Carolina has confirmed to have been initiated. EDIT: I must apologize, as I seem to have jumped the gun, I was mistaken, it was not removed.

Pepe Oats (talk) 16:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zazpot the citation is not fringe, as the author was one of the leading Prince Hall Freemasonry historians. The Library of Congress can corroborate the claim that Walkes was a major Prince Hall historian. He was the founder of the Phylaxis Society.

https://www.loc.gov/item/lcwa00087629/

The book I cited was an official history of the MWPHGLNC. The MWGL is selling the book as a reliable spurce, and the MWGL itself is a reliable source, so I don't see how it's fringe or unverifiable.

https://www.mwphglnc.org/product/mwphglnc-history-book/

Moreoever, the claim is again corroborated by the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Illinois.

https://mwphglil.com/famous.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pepe Oats (talk • contribs) 16:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the citation is not fringe... The claim is WP:FRINGE.

...as the author was one of the leading Prince Hall Freemasonry historians. Per your LoC link, the author you are referring to is Joseph A. Walkes, Jr. Let's look at his bibliography:

Year	Title	Publisher	Relevant WP:RS/WP:NPOV concerns	Notes
1981	Black Square & Compass: 200 Years of Prince Hall Freemasonry	Macoy Pub. and Masonic Supply Co.	WP:QUESTIONABLE, WP:BIASED	Publisher purveys literature supporting WP:FRINGE theories such as tarot and astrology.
1986	Jno G. Lewis, Jr. - end of an era: History of the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Louisiana, 1842-1979	Joseph A. Walkes, Jr.	WP:SELFPUB
1989	Prince Hall Masonic Quiz Book	Macoy Pub. and Masonic Supply Co.	WP:QUESTIONABLE, WP:BIASED	Publisher purveys literature supporting WP:FRINGE theories such as tarot and astrology.
1993	History of the Shrine, 1893–1993: Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order, Nobles of the Mystic Shrine	Inc.	WP:QUESTIONABLE, WP:BIASED	"Inc." seems to be an imprint of the Prince Hall Grand Lodge.
1993	Outside the Pale?	Journal of Mormon History	WP:QUESTIONABLE, WP:BIASED	A letter, not a peer-reviewed article. The central point of the letter was rebutted by a historian who has been peer-reviewed.
2001-2006	Joseph A. Walkes, Jr. web site	Joseph A. Walkes, Jr.	WP:SELFPUB

Walkes seems to meet the lowest bar for a historian: to have written one or more ostensibly non-fiction works of history and to have had them published. But this does not mean that Walkes is necessarily a WP:RS. In particular, none of his works seem to have been through a peer review process before publication, and some of them were published by WP:QUESTIONABLE publishers, as noted above.

The Library of Congress can corroborate the claim that Walkes was a major Prince Hall historian. The LoC page you linked to does describe Walkes as a "prolific Prince Hall Masonic author and historian", but makes no claim as to Walkes's reliability or importance.

He was the founder of the Phylaxis Society. Anyone can found a society, and self-publish a circular. I see no evidence that this makes Walkes a WP:RS, nor that it makes the claim that Mandela was a Freemason anything other than WP:FRINGE.

:The book I cited was an official history of the MWPHGLNC. "Official" in this instance seems to mean that it is the MWPHGLNC's self-published account of itself. This makes it WP:QUESTIONABLE, particularly in relation to "self-serving [or] exceptional claim[s]".

The MWGL is selling the book as a reliable spurce... First of all, you haven't presented any evidence that an entity called (or abbreviated as) "MWGL" is selling the book (you gave a link to the MWPHGLNC shop, but not to an MWGL shop). Secondly, it seems unlikely that a bookseller would hold itself liable for the accuracy of a book that it sells, except perhaps if it was published by the bookseller. Thirdly, even if the "MWGL" did claim that the book is reliable, that does not mean that the book is, in fact, reliable.

... and the MWGL itself is a reliable source, so I don't see how it's fringe or unverifiable. The "MWGL" is not necessarily a WP:RS. See WP:QUESTIONABLE. Even if it were a WP:RS, it would, given the obvious conflict of interest, have to be considered WP:BIASED.

Moreoever, the claim is again corroborated by the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Illinois. https://mwphglil.com/famous.html That website cites no evidence: it just gives a bald claim, without any detail to back up the assertion. Again, this does not seem to be a WP:RS and due to the obvious conflict of interest, should be considered WP:BIASED. Zazpot (talk) 02:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]