Talk:Freelancers Union

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

POV

Since there's been no discussion, and in particular no explanation for the POV, I propose to remove it. Richard Pinch (talk) 17:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of Freelancers Union health plan to other health plans

This article needs a comparison of the costs and benefits of Freelancers Union health plan to other health plans offered in New York State. New York State has relatively cheap, subsidized plans. They used to have a program called Healthy New York.

Remember, under Wikipedia rules )WP:NOR, you can't just go to the Freelancers Union web site, go to another web site, and compare prices and benefits. You have to find a comparison in an independent WP:RS. --Nbauman (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Freelancers Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100505044222/http://gawker.com:80/339510/freelancers-union-health-benefits-snafu-has-members-fuming to http://gawker.com/339510/freelancers-union-health-benefits-snafu-has-members-fuming

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Need to add content re: Trupo

Founded by insurance experts from Freelancers Union, Trupo is on a mission to even the playing field between freelance and full-time work. We partner with individual freelancers and groups and organizations of all sizes to help build a better freelance ecosystem. Read more about our Partners here. source: https://www.trupo.com/about-trupo^{[dead link]}

Why? — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 20:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfinished article

This article reads more like a blog post than an encyclopedia article. The fictive blogger has lazily or naively pasted in marketing copy and direct quotes with no attribution. (It's not enough to have a footnote. Readers need to know who said the words, and why it's so important to have the exact verbiage in there. Usually it's not important and a paraphrase is both briefer and clearer, if less glittery.)

The "Policy" section consists of gossip. There is also failure to address the fact that a founder's opinions are not necessarily identical with the policy of the organization she founded. As a result, the article isn't just uniformative; it may be misleading. — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 20:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]