Talk:Freedom Scientific

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Accessibility

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Accessibility, a group of editors promoting better access for disabled or otherwise disadvantaged users. For more information, such as what you can do to help, see the main project page.AccessibilityWikipedia:WikiProject AccessibilityTemplate:WikiProject AccessibilityAccessibility articles

Disability

Freedom Scientific is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

The official websites states, that the location in Europe is in Switzerland: http://www.freedomscientific.com/about/locations.asp This Wikipedia article states, the headquarter would be in Germany. --80.130.238.200 (talk) 21:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Europe location

EDIT: the website states, that the "headquarter" is in Switzerland/Tägerwilen and a support enter in Germany/Hamburg. --80.130.238.200 (talk) 21:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed the details in the main article. Graham87 01:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No articles available?

I'm specifically concerned that there are apparently no sources that analyze the impact of Freedom Scientific and their products. Specifically, their economic impact. Their hardware seems to be cheaper than competitors, such as Humanware, while their software is some of the more expensive on the market: Jaws being slightly more expensive than Window Eyes from GW Micro, to say nothing of free or OS-native alternatives such as Non Visual Desktop Access/NVDA, Microsoft Narrator or Apple's Voiceover. I would expect there to be public sources on legal matters, such as the recent patent claims lawsuit between Freedom Scientific and GW Micro, or the dispute with the developers of System Access. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.218.119.120 (talk) 17:03, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]