Talk:Freedom Angels Foundation
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Freedom Angels Foundation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name of group
[edit]Hello all. I chose to call the page Freedom Angels Foundation since that is how they present themselves (although it's often shortened to just Freedom Angels), even though there's no evidence it's actually a properly constituted foundation (or even a non-profit group). Robincantin (talk) 21:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
anti-vaccination vs. freedom(-)fighting
[edit]I reverted a repeated change from "anti-vaccination group" to "freedom fighting group", but afterwards realized that the group is anti-mask as well as anti-vaccination (with "anti-vaccination" taken loosely). If "anti-vaccination" is too specific, "freedom-fighting" is too unspecific. Could it be "anti-vaccination, anti-mask" or similar? –Roy McCoy (talk) 18:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Roy McCoy, thank you for reversing the changes. I think we should stick with anti-vaccination, since the sources clearly indicate that is the original purpose of the group and its sole aim until COVID came along. We've seen a lot of anti-vaccination groups join the anti-mask protests in what many sources describe as an opportunistic move to recruit and raise funds; this recent diversification does not change their nature, in my opinion. As time passes, maybe consensus over vocabulary to describe that amalgam will emerge (aside from 'pro-plague', which is facetious and insulting ).Robincantin (talk) 20:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Useful link although months old.[1].Doug Weller talk 07:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- How did I miss that one? Thanks, not much new info but supports a lot of the text already there.Robincantin (talk) 00:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Useful link although months old.[1].Doug Weller talk 07:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)