Talk:Free the Nipple (film)
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 September 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 1
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Presumed withdrawn. New alternative suggestion submitted below. (non-admin closure) BarrelProof (talk) 18:45, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Girlrillaz → FREE THE NIPPLE – The film Girlrillaz was the original working title, it's now been officially changed to FREE THE NIPPLE. The Internet Movie Database website IMDB can verify the authenticity of this change. Juan4637240 (talk) 06:57, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose the specific all-caps proposal: WP:ALLCAPS / MOS:CT. Deleting the article might be a good option, as it is basically unsourced. WP:GNG notability has not been established. —BarrelProof (talk) 07:20, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose the specific all-caps proposal: WP:ALLCAPS / MOS:CT. and yes, deleting might be a better option. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:24, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 2
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Presumed withdrawn. Slightly modified proposal below. (non-admin closure) BarrelProof (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Girlrillaz → Free The Nipple – Corrected the all-caps title to only the first letter of each word . 76.170.115.118 (talk) 16:32, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: The modified suggestion still doesn't follow MOS:CT. I think the "The" should be lowercased. I also repeat my suggestion from above that notability has not been established for this topic. I suggest spending some time searching for reliable sources that discuss the topic and adding citations to them (if they exist). I don't think submitting a third move request is necessary – if you're OK with lowercase "the", just let the discussion run its course – the person who closes the discussion will presumably include the minor modification. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 3
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. MER-C 17:32, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Girlrillaz → Free the Nipple – The film Girlrillaz was the original working title, it's now been officially changed to Free the Nipple. The Internet Movie Database website IMDB can verify the authenticity of this change. Juan4637240 (talk) 06:57, 11 September 2014 (UTC) [Refactored in from the original, incorrect nomination. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 02:11, 13 September 2014 (UTC)] Fixed "The" to "the", source:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2298394/releaseinfo?ref_=tt_dt_dt#akas . 76.170.127.30 (talk) 19:21, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Please see prior comments above. I don't really think that single cited source is sufficient to establish notability for the topic per WP:GNG (or is especially reliable), but it seems to be the only available evidence for what the title should be if we decide to keep the article. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:15, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support per "only available evidence for what the title should be", but agree that we need to "decide [whether] to keep the article", per BarrelProof's WP:GNG concerns. That's a WP:AFD matter, not a WP:RM matter. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 02:13, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.