Talk:Free Malaysia Today

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Free Malaysia Today article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Malaysia Mid‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Unusually poor sourcing - mainly from the subject publication

This article, about the publication Free Malaysia Today, appears to have been sourced entirely from that very publication. Except for the small "Controversy" section, and a single reference to a website-rating site, ALL other references cited come from the very publication that the article is about!

This is wholly inappropriate and inadequate for Wikipedia, blatantly violating WP:NPOV, and raises strong questions about the validity and credibility of this article, and the independence and neutrality of its author. Please find additional, substantial, credible, English-language sources for this article. Otherwise, it is a reasonable candidate for deletion -- notwithstanding the substantial online presence of Free Malaysia Today.

Penlite (talk) 10:55, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article overhauled & expanded - still needs better references

I've attempted to greatly improve the sourcing of the information on this site, but have found it difficult to locate independent online sources that address the content already here. So I have largely added new content, with references that I was able to find.

Nevertheless, this site remains far too dependent upon references to the subject itself: Free Malaysia Today. This needs improvement.

Penlite (talk) 15:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]