Talk:Free Geek

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-12-21. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

FG Olympia

The original FG Olympia link was removed by an unsigned user. However, there does seem to be an un-official FG in Olympia resulting from a slip there. I add the link in as a result. ---Wolfe 06:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

actually, olympia free geek is not an authorized free geek, if the org even exists at all. it has split up. see this page. Jon Lon Sito 07:54, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

someone added back in olympia again. i took it out again. to the best of my knowledge it is still not an official "Free Geek", as backed up by these free geek documents: [1], [2], and [3]. (in addition to the link i have above.) specifically, the third page states "Some groups that are not authorized to use the name Free Geek." (and then lists olympia) Jon Lon Sito (talk) 09:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oregonian articles

If someone has the time and ability to do so, they should go through The Oregonian archives, find their articles on Free Geek and use them to add references to this article. Jason McHuff (talk) 23:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scope of article

Does this article refer only to the mothership (in Portland) or does it refer to all of the Free Geeks? Gobonobo ^T ^C 05:25, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An excellent question. In my opinion it might be best to focus on the mothership, and have a section that mentions efforts in other places. -Pete (talk) 08:18, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A source for expansion

http://opensource.com/life/13/1/free-geek -Pete (talk) 08:18, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://web.archive.org/web/20090220201241/http://news.digitaltrends.com/feature/46/free-geek-helping-the-needy-get-nerdy-since-the-beginning-of-the-third-millennium

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Free Geek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Free Geek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated..

The FreeGeek Wikipedia pages is badly outdated. FreeGeek no longer supports volunteers working in thir warehouse since Covid (2020). They also closed their brick and more store and only sell item through their eBay store. AFAIK they also do not provide any onsite education/classes. Can someone who has edit/login permissions please post a notice about how potentially out of date this information may be. Thanks! 174.247.181.253 (talk) 08:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]