Talk:Frederick H. Bealefeld III

Frederick H. Bealefeld III was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 24, 2024	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 28, 2024.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a great-grandfather and a grandfather of a commissioner of the Baltimore Police Department also served in the department?

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Maryland: Baltimore Mid‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Baltimore Task Force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Article reads like advertisement

This strikes me as a glowingly positive portrayal of a very controversial figure in Baltimore. Who wrote this? (I'm new) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.62.239.31 (talk) 08:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frederick H. Bealefeld III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080626200926/http://www.baltimorepolice.org/about-us/officers/police-commissioner to http://www.baltimorepolice.org/about-us/officers/police-commissioner

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 20:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that a great-grandfather and grandfather of a commissioner of the Baltimore Police Department also served the department? Source: Sentementes, Gus (February 4, 2007). "Frederick H. Bealefeld III". Baltimore Sun. pp. B3. Retrieved February 9, 2024.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/DOM Clobbering
- Comment: This QPQ was done under my old username, but it's me - here's the rename log.

5x expanded by Queen of Hearts (talk). Self-nominated at 20:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Frederick H. Bealefeld III; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

This was suggested offwiki by Pretzelles, and probably flows better:

ALT0a: ... that a commissioner of the Baltimore Police Department was descended from two of its officers?

^Queen of _Hearts 04:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article is new and long enough (RPS expanded 26× on February 11). No concerns with Earwig and sourcing looks good in the article. Hook fact is interesting and cited inline, and the given citation checks out. Preference to ALT1 for flow and simplicity. QPQ completed so we're good to go. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 07:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Failed due to inactivity; however that was some great work of the expansion, Queen of Hearts! ~ Tails Wx (🐾, ⛈️) 22:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Frederick H. Bealefeld III/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Queen of Hearts (talk · contribs) 22:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Tails Wx (talk · contribs) 15:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review on this GAN! Great work on expanding this article from a one-sentence stub to... this! This'll take up to one week. Thanks! :) ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 15:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Tails Wx and thanks for offering to review the article! I never expected this article to get picked up so soon, so there's still some rough edges. Could I please have a few days to fully flesh out the article? Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience, ^Queenof_Hearts 08:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, no worries, Queen of Hearts! I'll pause my review for a few days to let ya continue your work on the article. I'm sorry if I started too early; I was ecstatic in reviewing a GAN for a commissioner or chief of a police department, as I did write Kevin Davis! ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 17:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly nudge, Queen of Hearts, it's been nearly two weeks! :0 ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 02:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another nudge since you've edited after the one above, Queen of Hearts! If this is not responded to, I unfortunately may have to fail this review due to inactivity. ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 02:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tails Wx, I am sorry that this has taken so long; if I do not get back to you in the next few days, please fail this. Queen of ♡ | speak 19:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Status query

Tails Wx, Queen of Hearts, what is the status of this review? While I do see that Queen of Hearts made some edits around the first of the month, that's almost three weeks without action since, and no post to this page since April 26. Should it be failed per the comments above, or perhaps by a date certain if not immediately? Thanks for your responses. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply @BlueMoonset, but yes, I’ll have to fail this for inactivity. I haven’t seen any edits to the article since May 1. ~ Tails Wx (🐾, ⛈️) 22:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.