Jump to content

Talk:Frederick Douglass/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Coordinates: 38°53′04″N 75°57′29″W / 38.8845°N 75.958°W / 38.8845; -75.958
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

I'd like to suggest that in the Further Reading, and Sources sections that the Frederick Douglass Papers Project be added. Their publications are the only scholarly editions of Douglass's writings, speeches, and letters. They are the most authoritative and well-researched of any Douglass publications. They shouldn't be ignored. Thanks for the consideration. Jahanna80 (talk) 17:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Grammar

I changed the phrase "Douglass was one of the most prominent figures" to "Douglass IS one of the most prominent figures" since he remains a historic figure, because it's not likely that African-American historians, or any, will decide that he's not one of the most prominent figures in African-American history anymore. This is strictly from a logical reasoning viewpoint. If grammar rules indicate that one should always say: "so and so WAS a historical figure", then it should be changed back. Thoughts? --Brian Tjoe-Nij (talk) 17:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Klan acts

i have a question about The Klan Acts. does anyone know what they are? if someone finds a site that has some good info, i think we should add a link to it. Osmo250 03:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

The "Klan Acts" are covered in Wikipedia, under different names:
  • Force Acts - Four of them, but especially the Force Act of 1870. The Force Act of 1870 (which came into effect in 1871) was an act that ended most of the Ku Klux Klan. In this act, the government banned the use of terror, force or bribery to prevent someone from voting because of their race. Other laws banned the KKK entirely and brought forth military help to enforce these laws. Eventually, KKK members were tried and thousands of Klansmen were arrested. The first Klan was almost eradicated within a year.

Laws in various USA states say that conspiracy to commit violence against particular groups because of hatred of same groups is illegal. Wikkrockiana 06:10, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

I was going to add a lot about Douglass' childhood to the beginning, does anyone think this would hurt the article? --Weirdo59 22:39, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Not if its in good formatt and you add one pic. to go along with a long section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deananoby2 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Harriet Bailey

The person who wrote this link her name. When you click on the link for her name it just takes you right back to this article. Im just assuming this is becuz there not alot of info on her and this is the only article on wiki that talks about her..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deananoby2 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 2 July 2006

Alternate History

Is the discussion on the science fiction alternative histories appopriate for a general article such as this? I don't think knowledge of the Turtledove books is necessary for an understanding of Douglass or his impact. I think that section should be taken out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexeditor (talk • contribs) 02:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

- Nobody replied, so I am taking this section out. I can't see how anyone thinks this belongs in a serious encylopedia article on Frederick Douglass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexeditor (talk • contribs) 02:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Science fiction alternative histories are not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Kaldari 16:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
I second that. It's like a slight disparaging act. Stuff like that can of course be added to an article on alternative histories ... --Brian Tjoe-Nij (talk) 18:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

year of birth

Febuary 17, 1818 should be listed as Douglass' birth year; per Library of Congress cataloging data and reference in William McFeely's 1991 biography. Mclawton 14:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

The postage stamp caption is incorrect. The 25-cent Douglass stamp was first issued February 14, 1967 in Washington, DC. The USPOD may have been operating on the assumption that this date was the sesquicentennial of Douglass's birth. Prior to this time, the Post Office had a long history of issuing stamps to commemorate famous black Americans; thus is it doubtful the issuance of stamp could be solely attributable to a rise in the civil rights movement per se. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.20.165 (talk) 14:37, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Source of the above information regarding the stamp is "Scott 2008 Specialized Catalogue of United States Stamps & Covers" (Scott 1290). A second Douglass stamp was issued by USPS in June 1995 as part of its "Civil War" series (Scott 2975h). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.20.165 (talk) 14:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Cultural depictions of Frederick Douglass

I've started an approach that may apply to Wikipedia's Core Biography articles: creating a branching list page based on in popular culture information. I started that last year while I raised Joan of Arc to featured article when I created Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc, which has become a featured list. Recently I also created Cultural depictions of Alexander the Great out of material that had been deleted from the biography article. Since cultural references sometimes get deleted without discussion, I'd like to suggest this approach as a model for the editors here. Regards, Durova 18:33, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Way overly revised

The usage of new terms such as "African American" should be declared unfit for a negro who lived in the 19th century. He never said that he was an "African American." There is nothing wrong with the word NEGRO.GhostofSuperslum 23:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Hmm. Nothing wrong with the word itself if it is used very carefully. "Negro" is an artifact of a discredited racial theory, referring to the racial aspect alone without the ethnic and cultural components. It originated from the Spanish or Portuguese word meaning black, referring to pigmented skin, but usually more brown than black. "Negroes" were actually many different African peoples, with differing racial and ethnic backgrounds. They certainly were not the same after the diaspora[1] and acculturation. African Americans today are quite different, neither black nor white.Fconaway 21:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
  1. ^ Nathan Irvin Huggins, Black Odyssey, The African-American Ordeal in Slavery, New York, Random House (1990) ISBN 0-679-72814-7

Not worth a hill of beans

The population of the United States doubles every 50 to 60 years, ergo, it will soon double from 300 million people to 600 million people. Granting the descendants of slaves a new name is not going to feed them when the population of the United States passes the number at which food becomes unattainable by the poor negroes. The name "African American" is not worth a hill of beans. GhostofSuperslum 16:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

I am very surprised

At the length of this article. One would expect a much larger article on such a historically noteworthy individual as Frederick Douglass. Wikipediarules2221 04:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Very weak article for such a famous person. Uncle John's Bathroom Reader Plunges Into Great Lives says at page 286 that he was born Frederick Baily in 1818 in Easton Maryland, that he only saw his mother a few times, was raised by his grandmother Betsy Baily, that he never met his father and it was rumoured his white owner Aaron Anthony was his father. I recommend you get permission from Uncle John and incorporate his article to add some substance to this article. DParker. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.161.1.172 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Needs a real Bio

There should definitely be more of a bio here - look at William Lloyd Garrison. Frederick Douglass was an absolutely huge figure in abolitionism, and deserve far more than a cursory few sentences of biography. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.247.249 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Also, in the second paragraph, first sentence: "...whether black, woman, Native American, or recent immigrant." should be stated differently. This format implicates that each of these examples is the only potential variant of its respective category (ie woman being the only sex). I could not edit the page, but it, stated as such, almost encourages a de facto opinion that each of these examples are those only susceptible to such discriminations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.54.92.149 (talk) 19:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Bio?

Why is there no biography for Fredrick Douglass? I don't think that a few quotes, some trivia and a quick summary of him is adequate for an encyclopedia entry on one of the most important figures in African-American rights. I assume that there's some reconstruction of a biography going on, possibly a result of some vandalism, but in the event that there is just no bio, I think that somebody should write one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.108.29.20 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Many people have whined on this discussion page abut the need for a real bio. If you feel that this is so important, why don't you write a bio instead of complaining that no one else has? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.177.143.55 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
This information source might be a good start. I'd add it to the article's External Links, if it weren't locked down.
Obituary, February 21, 1895 Death Of Fred Douglass By THE NEW YORK TIMES
68.228.70.223 15:34, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


Thank you for your suggestion regarding Frederick Douglas. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). --Robin63 15:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


Quote re: political party

"I am a Republican, a black, dyed in the wool Republican, and I never intend to belong to any other party than the party of freedom and progress." If this quote is kept, there should be some note as to what party he was referring to, since the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_the_United_States article doesn't show the current republican party as existing during his lifetime. Personally I don't see why this quote would be kept at all though, I certainly hope he's left a more lasting legacy than that. -- David Alves —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.14.115 (talk • contribs) 09:36, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

edit: The main article for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_%28United_States%29 shows it as starting in 1856, but I still think that quote is a poor choice for inclusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.14.115 (talk • contribs) 09:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

It is intended to reflect "small r republicanism" ideals moreso than the party ideals, though at that point in time, the two were essentially one and the same. Piuro 08:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh, for God's sake. One doesn't have to refer "back to what small 'r' Republicans meant to the black race" two centuries ago. For more current information, you have but to look to the 40's, 50's, 60's of the LAST century. Has everyone forgotten (CURRENT, 'alive' and babbling) Senator Grand KKK Poobah Byrd of WV? Orville Faubus of AK? George Wallace of AL? Senator and DixieCrat Strom Thurmond of SC? Gov Lester Maddox of GA? On and on and on...
Democrats, everyone. And who stood for minority rights in the face of their bigotry? REPUBLICANS. It's time that lots of folks take a deep breath, smell the coffee, and take a large bite of reality sandwich. That blacks think their progress lies with the party that wants to keep them down trodden, dependent and in ideological chains is one of today's major paradoxes. That Douglass proclaimed his staunch Republican affiliation can do quite well without prevarication and contorted explanations.
68.228.70.223 15:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

African American & Protestant

I would disagree with the objection below to the use of the term 'African American'. I wa surprised to see that comment since it is much more precise and self-explanatory; the preference of some for the term negro is archaic, and I would have thought archaic words should be left where they are found - in very old editions, or if used, should be in quotation marks. I am taking a European point of view, which I think shoudl be considered as not all readers are American.

My reason to add this talk piece however, is to comment that by 'Protestant' the author probably means 'nonconformist' in the section covering 'Travels to Europe' - a section that could be enlarged upon. Camposanta 22:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

African American

I think that it is very inapropite to calla black man an "African American" considering that you have come dricetly from africa to Amaerica to be an "african American" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.203.58.93 (talk) 11:40, February 21, 2007

I think the consensus view is that African-Americans are Americans whose ancestors came from Africa, and not only Americans who were born in Africa. — Malik Shabazz | Talk 18:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Fredrick's Birthdday

His birthday is february 14 not the 17 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.73.117.206 (talk) 00:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC).

African American

I think the word african American is ove It give off the vive that all black people come from africa which i believe is un true The word afican americn is just as offending as calling some one by their racial name The term african american is an undercover stereotype and should be abolished. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.151.96.233 (talk) 01:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC).

Famous Quotes

20 dollar bill

I know this is no place for a poll count but who here thinks that Andrew Jackson should finally be removed and, in his place, put Fredrick Douglass on the $20 bill???? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.174.141.133 (talk) 18:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC).

Okay! That would be a huge improvement.Fconaway (talk) 17
37, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Gutenberg

It seems odd to me to list his collected works at Project Gutenberg as well as the individual works. Anyone else think this should be edited?216.185.23.50 20:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

His tour in Ireland (from WP:RD/H)

Frederick Douglas was not the first black abolitionist to speak in Ireland; his tour in 1845 had been preceded by that of Charles Lenox Remond, who came four years previously. While Remond was there, Daniel O'Connell, the leading spokesman for Irish nationalism, organised the 'Great Irish Address', a petition urging Irish Americans to oppose slavery, which attracted some 60,000 signatures. So, Ireland was fertile ground for Douglas' tour, which took in some fifty locations, but the specific reason for coming when he did was in anticipation of the first Irish edition of Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglas, an American Slave. Also, Douglas had great respect for O'Connell, considered by many to be the leading European abolitionist. When he died in 1847, Douglas wrote of him "...the cause of the American slave, not less than the cause of his country, had met with a great loss."

Douglas' lecture tour began in Dublin in August 1845. The topic, curiously, was not slavery at all, but the evils of alcohol -"The immediate, and it may be the main cause of the extreme poverty and beggery in Ireland, is intemperance." But Douglas was also fully aware of what was happening in Ireland at this time-the beginning of the great Potato Famine-and of the various political injustices that had been perpetrated on the island-"They have been long oppressed; and the same heart that prompts me to plead the cause of the American bondsman, makes it impossible not to sympathise with the oppressed of all lands." He confined these thoughts, though, to his letters to William Lloyd Garrison, using his public platform to focus for the most part on the issue of slavery.

Speaking in Belfast in December Douglas singled out the Free Church of Scotland, led by Thomas Chalmers, for particular criticism. Chalmers had received large donations from the American slave-owning states for his work among the urban poor in Scotland, which Douglas argued should all be sent back. Although well-received in Belfast it ensured he met with a hostile reception from Free Church members when he came to Scotland.

Douglas continued to take an interest in Irish affairs up to his death in 1895, speaking on the theme of Irish Home Rule on the same platform as Charles Stewart Parnell. Clio the Muse 23:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

All of the above is dealt with in the new documentary Frederick Douglass and the White Negro the film also examines the relationship between the African-American and the Irish-American. See main page for details under documentaries on Frederick Douglass.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.44.106.178 (talk) 20:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Date of Birth

I see a section here dedicated to year, but right now on the article, there are two different dates given for his birth: February 14th in the opening paragraph, and February 17th in the information box. Can we please fix this, with sources? Marsofel 04:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Move Over

Someone needs to move the picture and the beginning paragraph so its at the top (I forget how to at the moment), as when I cam eto the page I saw a big blank space and thought the article was only a picture. o_o;Silver seren 22:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

why is there a contradict flag on this article

What is the source of the contradiction? In the absence of a reply, I will remove the flag. Skywriter 20:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

I read through the article and I didn't see a contradiction in it? I wonder who put up the flag...Silver seren 23:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Maybe there was an earlier dispute since settled. I'll take it down and if someone wants to argue the point, I feel sure they'll slap it back up. Skywriter 23:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Or they might just do it if they feel like it. :/ I've seen it happen.Silver seren 23:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
If either of you troubled to take a look at the edit history, you'd see that the tag was placed there because the article lists two different DOBs for Douglass, February 14 (in the lead) and February 17 (in the infobox). Ford MF 00:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Why the hostility Fordmadoxfraud? It would have been easier for you to look up the date, as I just did, then to take a slap at colleagues and slap another tag on this page. If you are interested in the subject, you should be interested in adding facts.Skywriter 01:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Thats the big deal, the date? Thats slightly stupid. Why don't you just put that his birthdate is uncertain and that it could be either the 14th or the 17th. That would clear up any problems.Silver seren 02:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

of course the date is a big deal, its important factual information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.243.220.21 (talk) 13:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Education

As a grad student, I've been researching Douglass's view of and contributions to education for both slaves and free African Americans. I would very much like to add a few of my findings to this site. Here, as in so many areas, Douglass was a true visionary. Alhuga 13:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

ERRORS!!!

See http://www.history.rochester.edu/class/douglass/part1.html and compare it to this article. andkore 22:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

I have the quote from him as follows: 'At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument, is > needed. Oh had I the ability, and could reach the nation’s ear, I > would, pour out a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, > withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke. For it is not light that is > needed, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need > the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.117.132 (talk) 13:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Adding material about estimating time of birth

I would like to see (or make, but I cannot edit the page,) some changes about F.D's time of birth. 1) I'd prefer the birth date listed at the top of the article to be changed to simply the month and year, February 1818, since the implication of it's being there is that he was known to be born then rather than that he chose to celebrate it on those anniversaries. 2) I'd like to promote the material about his birth date, and his choice of when to recognize it, to a section with a header. 3) I'd like to see the following facts about establishing his time of birth: Frederick Douglass published several opinions about his date of birth. In "Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass, an American slave" he wrote,

I come to this [his estimate of his age], from hearing my master say, some time during 1835, I was about seventeen years old.

In "My bondage and my freedom" he wrote,

From certain events, however, the dates of which I have since learned, I suppose myself to have been born about the year 1817.

In "Life and Times of Frederick Douglass" he wrote,

From certain events, however, the dates of which I have since learned, I suppose myself to have been born in February, 1817.

Later the records of Douglass's former owner Aaron Anthony were examined by Dickson Preston, as reported in William McFeely's Frederick Douglass biography, and these indicated February of 1818 to be the birth date. Spandlingford 19:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

==

I made these changes Nov 6, 2007, deleting a footnote about his birthday after moving some text from that footnote into the new section I added about establishing his date of birth. PROBLEM: the template for giving a birthdate seemed to require a day-of-month, and so no established date can be given in this format. I think we need to have forms for date of birth that allow omission of day-of-month and for omitting month. Spandlingford 20:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Demote or remove speculation until it is verified

I think the speculation that Frederick Douglass was a muslim should be moved to an area lower in the article. While it is true that there is speculation, it is not a fact that deserves such prominence in the article. It detracts from the overall flavor of the article from one of truth and veracity to one that has notions that still need to be investigated. I think a note at the bottom would handle this speculation very nicely. Truth2112 23:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Emancipation Proclamation Date

This article says that it was December 31, 1862 while the main article says January 1, 1863... WHICH IS IT? There are different dates all over the web. Let's get it right. 204.152.12.95 (talk) 21:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Need assistance

This article has some vile stuff that appears early in the page as an article, but doesn't show up on the edit page; can someone who knows the finer points of editing fix this? Knapsack (talk) 03:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knapsack (talk • contribs) 03:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

It isn't clear what you're referring to. Could you be a little more explicit? Thanks. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 04:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Malik -- the page had this embedded in it -- {{slavery}} which you can sandbox to see what it does, but it ain't nice and it ain't right. I just don't know enough about Wikiness to know how someone made that little insert work the way it does, and make sure it doesn't happen again. Knapsack (talk) 03:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

That's a template, and it helps readers navigate to other articles related to the subject of slavery. It doesn't mean that Douglass was involved in those practices. Is it distracting when you read the article? Why do you think it should be removed?
If you think there's a problem with the template itself, you could bring it up at Template talk:Slavery. For example, if you object to certain links in the template, or if you think the template belongs in articles about slavery but not in biographies, that would be the appropriate place to raise those concerns. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 21:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Contradictory birth years

The lead gives 1917, the section on his birthdate says 1918. --24.215.162.198 (talk) 17:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I see February, 1818. (the exact date is not known)Fconaway (talk) 04:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

no no no

dude i am a more younger person and i see millions of mistakes this is why my teacher says dont use wikipedia for prodjects its unreliable p.s he was born in tuckahoe, maryland try reading his bio the narrative of the life of frederick douglass he wrote in 1845 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.77.96 (talk) 21:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the comment. Have you read the part about his date of birth, here?Fconaway (talk) 03:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Date of Frederick Douglass Day?

Can anyone tell me if there is a correct date for Frederick Douglass Day? It seems to be celebrated on February 14th as well as on the 20th. Thanks. Symmetric (talk) 17:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Quotes

The extensive quotes should be sourced.--Parkwells (talk) 14:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

It's a curious thing about the Quotes sections on Wikipedia pages: they're often full of unsourced, incorrectly sourced and paraphrased quotations, as if the usual rules for verifiability needn't apply.

Of the ten quotations by Douglass in the Quotes section, five were already on Douglass' Wikiquote page. I've sourced and added the remaining five for the Wikiquote page as well. Since there is no need to duplicate the quotations here, I have deleted them. - InvisibleSun (talk) 07:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Presidential candidate?

This page[1] seems to indicate that in 1848 Frederick Douglass received 1 of 104 votes at the convention of the Liberty Party (United States) for President. That might make him both the first AA VP and P candidate. Шизомби (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Again returning to the above syr.edu page, one of the presidential candidates who ultimately received the vice presidential nomination was C.C. Foote. Foote is identified in The Provincial Freeman: A New Source for the History of the Negro in Canada and the United States by Alexander L. Murray The Journal of Negro History, Vol. 44, No. 2 (Apr., 1959), pp. 123-135 as "a white preacher from Detroit." However, in Martin Delany, Frederick Douglass, and the Politics of Representative Identity By Robert S. Levine 259 n.46 he is identified as a "black minister." If AA, he would be the first VP candidate prior to Douglass. Шизомби (talk) 21:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Curious as to whether Douglass was ever aware of his Liberty Party, Equal Rights Party, or Republican Party noms. Also, the Republican Party nom is currently mentioned under his family life; the whole article needs some reorganizing. Шизомби (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Speech

I'd like to add the following, under "Speeches":

The Meaning of July Fourth for the Negro

Sadly, the article is locked. Would someone be so kind as to add it for me? Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.198.107 (talk) 16:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

My Escape from Slavery

did he not write this? I see no mention of it in the article, unless I am mistaken...?--Sonjaaa (talk) 21:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Abolitionist Activities

The next to the last sentence of the second paragraph in the section "Travels to Ireland and Great Britain" is scrambled.

Also there is no mention of Douglass having lived in Rochester, NY for 30 years (many would say his most productive). He moved here in 1847, began publishing the North Star from the basement of AME Zion Church (still standing), had an office in the Tallman Building downtown (still standing), pushed for and intergrated the local schools in 1851 so that his daughter could attend, worked closely here with Susan B. Anthony on suffrage and abolition, helped many escaped slaves along the underground railroad through here to Canada, and is buried here in Mt. Hope Cemetary.

Rochester considers him one of our biggest historical heroes, and there is a large statue of Douglass in Highland Park. We recently named our new bridge over the Genesee River for him (and Susan B. Anthony).

I would add some of this but the article is locked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkmiller26 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

{{editsemiprotected}}

I suggest the following category be added to Douglass' Wikipedia page:

Category:Americans of mixed Black African-European ethnicity

The aforementioned category has meager articles linked to it, and Douglass is one of the most well known Americans of mixed Black African and European ancestry.

Ehhviin (talk) 12:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Though the identity of his father is disputed, I feel that this is still a good edit. Added. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 22:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Birthplace coordinates at Tappers Corner, Maryland

I know the infobox person template has a coordinates parameter in which the longitude and latitude of the resting place (cemetery, tomb, etc.) of a person can be shown. How about where they were born? The birthplace of Douglass was determined by Amanda Barker in 1996 to be at Tappers Corner in Maryland, between Cordova and Hillsboro, but closer to Cordova, and from the very detailed description and Barker's map I just now determined that its coordinates are here: 38°53′04″N 75°57′29″W / 38.8845°N 75.958°W / 38.8845; -75.958

Barker and her dad would have used mapquest or google maps if they had done the research in the last couple of years. They would have found the coordinates themselves. Now that we have them, does anybody think we could find room in the article for this information? Binksternet (talk) 22:10, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

No reference to Ottilie Assing?

It seems appropriate to include a reference and a link to the Wikipedia page on Ottilie Assing, Douglass' longtime lover.Pjbristolwright (talk) 22:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

When and why did he take the name Douglass?

The article says his birth name was Bailey like his mother and grandmother, and later lists several owners none of whom were named Douglass. So where did the name Douglass come from? When and why did he adopt this name? Presumably prior to his 1845 autobiography. Dirac66 (talk) 02:02, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Error needs correcting

In the third paragraph under the "Life as a Slave" section it says that Douglass called his slave owners lecture on why slaves shouldn't read "the first anti-abolitionist speech he had ever heard" when he really called it the first "anti-slavery" speech he had ever heard. I could not find a web link to prove this, but it is in his autobiography under the chapter learning to read. It is not a paradox, he is simply pointing out that hearing such talk about slaves and keeping them stupid only reinforced his belief that slavery was wrong and slaves should be free, making it an "anti-slavery speech" to his ears.

Please change "the first anti-abolitionist speech" to "the first anti-slavery speech" {{editsemiprotected}} —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThePATH420 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 9 October 2009

Not done:Welcome and thanks for wanting to improve the accuracy of this article. You don't need a web link, but you do need to provide a reference for this change. If you look at the common fields in wp:cite book, you will see the information that is required. The page number and ISBN allow someone to quickly verify the information. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome. The book is the autobiography of Frederick Douglass. In my library it is called "The Life and Times of Frederick Douglass" but this site calls it "The Narrative of Frederick Douglass" The chapter is called "Learning to Read" Also, Thank you for not correcting a BLATANT fucking error. Continue to make wikipedia a useless resource due to it's errors. Welcome to real world knowledge, wikipedia is a useless piece of shit due to people like you.

The book The life and times of Frederick Douglass: his early life as a slave, his escape from bondage, and his complete history shows ThePATH420 to be right on page 50. I'll change the article. Binksternet (talk) 12:22, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
On the other hand, the 1845 version, called Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave. Written by Himself has on page 33 the same situation, but Douglass does not say it was his first anything. He writes "It was a new and special revelation, explaining dark and mysterious things, with which my youthful understanding had struggled, but struggled in vain. I now understood what had been to me a most perplexing difficulty--to wit, the white man's power to enslave the black man. It was a grand achievement, and I prized it highly. From that moment, I understood the pathway from slavery to freedom." So which version do we represent here? Dover's later version, or Douglass's first edition? Binksternet (talk) 12:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Error - incorrect name

The article cites three times that Frederick Douglass was hired out to a Mr Freeman, where he started a Sunday school for fellow slaves. This should be Mr Freeland. My source is the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, written by himself and published in 1845 by the Boston Anti-Slavery Office. In his narrative Douglass names Mr Freeland numerous times, including this paragraph: "At the close of the year 1834, Mr. Freeland again hired me of my master, for the year 1835. But, by this time, I began to want to live upon free land as well as with Freeland; and I was no longer content, therefore, to live with him or any other slaveholder." The italics are Douglass' own. Douglass became a freeman, but he worked for Freeland. Hannahbayman (talk) 22:04, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Frederick Douglass/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs more inline citations and a longer introduction. Kaldari 16:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

I think that this article is actualy rather well writen, and with a few touch ups, we could begin to think about raising it to an "A class." --Robin63 15:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

With a quick glance it appears that the article could be B-class right away, if only better referenced. Punkmorten (talk) 07:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 07:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 20:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Frederick_Douglass/Archive_1&oldid=1136739823"