Talk:Fred Shero/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: intelatitalk 06:40, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
The bolded things need attention.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Well referenced, and no synthesis
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Well written, and easy to understand. even for a hockey n00b
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- yep
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Hmmm... My first two GA nominations have little to no pictures. :/
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- I like pretty pictures, so can you find a team photo or something like that?
- I like pretty pictures, so can you find a team photo or something like that?
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Just a nitpicky thing, the "Personal life" seems a little small. can you expand on it?
- Pass/Fail:
- I expanded the personal life section, as for the pictures I searched through Flickr and emailed a couple of users one didn't want to change the licensing the other one, who had a picture of the team that looked to be a photo taken by a no-professional (which makes me think they might hold the copy rights), but they have not responded and I doubt they will at this point. I don't know where else to find free images and I think that attempting to add it under fair use would fail Contextual significance. "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding."--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 04:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'll pass this one. --intelatitalk 17:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'll pass this one.
- I expanded the personal life section, as for the pictures I searched through Flickr and emailed a couple of users one didn't want to change the licensing the other one, who had a picture of the team that looked to be a photo taken by a no-professional (which makes me think they might hold the copy rights), but they have not responded and I doubt they will at this point. I don't know where else to find free images and I think that attempting to add it under fair use would fail Contextual significance. "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding."--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 04:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)