Talk:Frank Tudor

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Victoria / Politics B‑class Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Frank Tudor is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Images

Who removed images without discussion and why? Timeshift (talk) 05:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, that was my bad. I was rewriting the article in my sandbox so that this article wouldn't look like a sandbox and neglected to re-add the images. I will return at least one - a second may not fit. Littleteddy (roar!) 10:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAN

A short note about length: Tudor didn't have a very eventful or lengthly life. This is the reason for the short article. Littleteddy (roar!) 11:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Informal feedback: I took a look at the article, and am not hopeful that it will pass. Two things stand out to me: first, the lead section is not nearly thorough enough; it should give a pretty good overview of the subject, and clearly identify why he is noteworthy. Second, the article is essentially all based on one source. (Only a couple small details are cited to others.) Though this is not technically a disqualifier for GA, it seems likely to me that there are other sources available. I would prefer to see an article have a number of independent sources before a GA nom. Hope this is helpful, looks like an interesting guy! -Pete (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]