Jump to content

Talk:Frank Loesser

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:FrankLoesser.jpg

[edit]

Image:FrankLoesser.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template

[edit]

There is a template "needs expert attention", on this article. I see no edit summary nor further explanation on this talk page to show what the problem(s) is(are). I have edited this article previously and, to me, I see no problems that would require an expert. (I am certainly not an expert in anything.) Therefore, after a week or so, I propose to delete the template, after I carefully read this article again, and after I read some online sources to see what might be lacking, and assuming no one objects. I have asked the editor who placed the template for comments. JeanColumbia (talk) 18:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed this article, and find nothing that would need the expert attention requested by the template, so I removed the template. (I made some minor copy edits to the article.) JeanColumbia (talk) 15:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Life

[edit]

Details of personal life need some clean up. Specifically, the section starts with marriage to Jo Sullivan but fails to mention how he did not now become a bigamist with the assistance of his first wife, mentioned earlier in the article, who introduced him to Sullivan. (IMDB lists a divorce in 1957.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jszigeti (talk • contribs) 09:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Date of death

[edit]

The date given in the article is July 26, 1969, and that date is also given in the biography found on Loesser's official website. However, Loesser's New York Times obituary, published on July 29, 1969, states in the first sentence that Loesser died "yesterday," i.e. July 28. The AP and UPI obituaries published the same day say the same. (Technically, the AP obit says he died "Monday," but July 29, 1969 was a Tuesday, so...). Since a newspaper is a more reliable source than a self-published website, I changed the date in the article.John (talk) 20:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

City College

[edit]

Was Loesser 14 years old when attending City College of New York? The article says he left after one year in 1925. If born in 1910 he would have been 14 or 15 years old. True? 94.67.20.208 (talk) 18:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good point! This is the statement from the PBS article: "Bored with formal education (he flunked out of the City College of New York in 1925, his first year)". This is the statement from his own web site: "He attended Townsend Harris High School and New York's City College, which he dropped out of during the Depression, and supported himself with an array of jobs that included selling newspaper advertising..." ([1]). I believe that the depression started around 1929, and therefore we might assume that Mr. L. dropped out around that time, rather than 1925. This certainly calls for further research, but I will not have the time to do it until early December, at the earliest. JeanColumbia (talk) 18:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(Had a little bit of time.) This is what Susan Loesser, his daughter, wrote: " was accepted at Townsend Harris, a three-year high school for gifted children, but expelled before graduation because he put more of his creative energy into practical jokes than into his studies. At fifteen he was accepted without a high school diploma at City College of New York, then expelled again, shortly after entering-for failing every subject but English and gym, and for polishing the nose of a bronze statue." (ref: A most remarkable fella, Frank Loesser and the guys and dolls in his life : a portrait by his daughter, Hal Leonard Corporation, 2000, ISBN 0634009273, p. 8) Since he was born on June 29, 1910, I'd think that he entered City College in 1925, at age 15, and left in 1925-1926, based on Susan Loesser's book. Therefore, I am inclined to say that the date in the article is correct.JeanColumbia (talk) 12:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Writing Career

[edit]

The sentence "After a year of his songs being noticed by publishers or performers, he was fired" does not make logical sense to me; should it not say "After a year of his songs NOT being noticed by publishers or performers, he was fired"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Picker O'nits (talk • contribs) 19:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the 1961 Original Cast Album Grammy award for How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying, I discovered missing while doing some Jazz music research. In the entry here, no mention is made of the Grammy, and it says "received another Tony." It would seem to be a simple edit to add, "Tony, and a Grammy award for Grammy Award for Best Musical Theater Album#1960s or similar, I wanted to check before making the change.Cathcam (talk) 21:20, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Grammy is noted in the Awards and legacy section. It could use a cite. Is it worth mentioning twice? Barte (talk) 22:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch, not sure how I missed that. I'll add it to the descriptive in this sections with a ref, and then use the same ref for the awards section.--Cathcam (talk) 18:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank Loesser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images of Loesser

[edit]

The non-free image of Loesser recently deleted from Wikimedia Commons was just replaced with another non-free image on Wikimedia Commons, this one available for licensing from Getty Images. If you click through, you'll see the note:

"The uploader did not provide sufficient information (a valid and suitable tag) on this media's copyright status. Unless the copyright status is provided, the file could be deleted seven days after the upload (29 February 2020)."

In other words, this image too will be deleted. It's possible that a non-free image could be deemed "fair use" for use on Wikipedia (as opposed to Wikimedia Commons). But per WP:NFCI, while fair use might apply to some "pictures of deceased persons, in articles about that person, provided that ever obtaining a free close substitute is not reasonably likely," an image "from a press or photo agency (e.g., AP, Corbis or Getty Images) [that] is not itself the subject of critical commentary" won't work. Barte (talk) 18:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:07, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:51, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:22, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Frank_Loesser&oldid=1208010861"