Talk:Frank Bailey (firefighter)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AhmadLX (talk · contribs) 18:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review this article. Regards Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 18:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Earwig's shows high-match with this Facebook post. The date of addition of the content in question is same: 26.11.2020. However, the timestamp of the fb post is 14:41 GMT, whereas the content was added to this article before that time (03:30 GMT). As such, I conclude that the fb post has copied content from this article, and not the other way around. Same with this news article, where the content was added at 06:45 GMT, some 3 hours later than this article. As such, both posts copied Wikipedia content without attribution. So, copyvio clear.

DOB 26 November 1925 is not in [1]: ITV News, nor in [2]: Guardian. Both only say that he was 90 at the time of his death. [4] chiswickherald should replace these two here.
The ITV Source does not explicitly say his birth date is 26/11/1925 but says he died on "2nd December 2015, six days after his 90th birthday" thus per WP:CALC that must be his birth date but I added another source (The Independent) which solidifies this claim.
"He was married to Isabella Maven but they divorced later." Move this bit down below and add it near the mention of other wives and children.
Done
That he went from NY back to Guiana and then to London is a conjecture not supported by the sources. Please remove the shortly after returning to British Guiana part.
I have not removed the line but I have fixed the sourcing as before it previously only referred to the BBC article, I have added The Guardian source here as well which says After briefly returning to British Guiana he made his way to London, where in 1955, and the BBC one says However, Mr Bailey, who had moved to London from Guyana in 1953
Add doodle bit to the preceding section; one-line sections should be avoided.
Done
Doodle thing should be cited with some other sources: check this for example.
Done Added The Independent source.

Thanks for the fixes, but I meant complete removal of the google source, which you can now do as you've found another source.

Also, please find some other source for "coal trimmer" and replace google page with it.
Done replaced

@AhmadLX: Thank you very much for taking the time to review this article I have responded to your comments and have made approriate changes. Regards Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 22:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for addressing the issue. The article now meets the criteria, and is thus a Pass. Nice work. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 00:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great thank you very much AhmadLX for taking the time to review the article. Regards Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 09:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed