Talk:Frank Auerbach
A news item involving Frank Auerbach was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 17 November 2024. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cezanne?
[edit]Is there any attribution for the remark about Cezanne? It's not cited, and it isn't evident to me from his work, not that I'm an art critic, but I've probably seen as much Cezanne and certainly more Auerbach than the average museumgoer. - Jmabel | Talk 02:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Fictional treament in W.G. Sebald's 'The Emigrants'
[edit]The character of the artist Max Ferber in Sebald's 'The Emigrants' is based in part on Frank Auerbach, according to this article in The Guardian, as well as in this blog
Is this something that could be added to the original article as a reference, or something of that sort? Eam531 (talk) 13:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Frank Auerbach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130926200940/http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio3/johntusainterview/auerbach_transcript.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio3/johntusainterview/auerbach_transcript.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
RfC: which non-free images should be kept on this page?
[edit]Based on the discussion at FFD, there is a policy-based consensus that the two non-free images at Frank Auerbach should be reduced to one. As discussed in the close, I'm organizing an RFC on the matter. I've organized a single discussion section at the bottom to discuss these works. Otherwise, I'm pinging @Cactus.man, Stefan2, Modernist, Finnusertop, Ceoil, Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, and Explicit: -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- If only one can be kept, I would choose Julia. It adds a bit of colour to the page. According to this article, she sits for him about three time a week, so the painting is representative, The other can be seen by anyone interested on the National Galleries of Scotland website (maybe an external link at the bottom?) Also, WP:ILIKEIT.—Anne Delong (talk) 11:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep both
[edit]Remove both
[edit]Discussion
[edit]Bomberg
[edit]David Bomberg was the biggest influence on his style and therefore his most important influence altogether. This is a fact. And I'm not sure why it hasn't been emphasised more in the article. Greg von Bock's illegitimate son (talk)
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- C-Class Germany articles
- Mid-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- C-Class United Kingdom articles
- Mid-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles