Talk:Franco-British Union

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps, showing the British Empire and the French Empire in 1956, be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in France or United Kingdom may be able to help!

List of colonies

Is it necessary to list the colonies of the proposed union in the introduction of the article? The list of colonies has changed other time and the Union has been proposed at different times in the 20th century (1904, 1940 and 1956 according to the article.) Moreover this information is not very useful. 2A01:E0A:16:ED0:CD73:2D0D:382A:9C72 (talk) 07:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The list & map are inaccurate, as at 1940. Many British colonies of the time are missing (eg Malay States, Straits Settlements, Hong Kong). It also includes territories of each power which weren’t technically colonies but eg protectorates (eg Tunisia, Uganda) broadly independent British Dominions (eg Canada). Map / list should be comprehensive if included, and use accurate terms. Suggest something generic like “territories”. 2A01:CB19:3C8:D300:4C0A:922B:10E5:E80E (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Franco-German Union

it was said in the post-WWII 20th century france formed the germano-french european couple after a diplomatic failure between a british-french union. actually from its roots in the Franks era france is closer to germany than england isn'it? Paris By Night 06:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(1) On the formation of the Germano-French couple created after the British-French unions failures: no, there is no direct link between the failures of the various proposals on a British-French union and the creation of the "Germano-French couple." The dates don't match up. The article mentions 1904 (Entente Cordiale), 1940 (WW2) and 1956 (Suez Crisis.) Of course there was no rapprochement between France and Germany in 1904 (10 years before Germany invaded France) and in 1940 (during WW2.) In contrast, the relations between France and Germany improved between 1925 (Locarno Treaties) and 1932, and then after WW2, mainly within the framework of European integration, and formalised in 1963 under the Élysée Treaty. The need for reconciliation and a lasting peace in Europe were the driving force behind the Franco-German rapprochement, rather than the "failure" of a very hypothetical union between France and the UK. Even as a factor of influence, I would name the UK's lack of interest for the European integration before these very hypothetical projects. 2A01:E0A:16:ED0:CD73:2D0D:382A:9C72 (talk) 07:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(2) On the fact that France is closer to Germany than to England, due to its roots in the Franks era: Sure, Charlemagne provided a historical reference for the European integration. But France also has historical links with England, through the Anglo-Norman kingdom, and the Angevin empire. Culturally, the English language borrowed a lot of vocabulary from the French, and historically the fact that they were important colonial powers was both a subject of rivalry and of rapprochement. 2A01:E0A:16:ED0:CD73:2D0D:382A:9C72 (talk) 07:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Geographically, yes! France and Germany share a border. Culturally? Also yes, sort of. Border regions (especially those which have changed hands between France and Germany/Prussia) have strong intermixing of cultures. Riesling wine, for instance! It makes as much sense as a union between the UK and US, and many have suggested the UK is "the 51st state". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.183.201 (talk) 01:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Culturally? NO!! France is closer culturally to Italia than Germany, sorry!So an Franco-Italian Union is better. ;)

France is closer culturally to Italia? NO!! Italy is closer culturally to Spain than France, sorry! Only South East France (Provence, Corsica) is closer culturally to Italia.88.178.38.7 (talk) 09:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scotland and France

should be mentioned the scotts and french fought their common foe during the Hundred Years' War. Paris By Night 06:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could be. However Scotland wasn't (and still isn't) a sovereign nation at the time of Mollet's request. The union would have been between France and the UK. Remember that the terms "Anglo" and "British" when used in such context do not necessarily refer to England (note the Anglo-French Concorde, developed during a similar period in history to Mollet's request). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.183.201 (talk) 01:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ireland and france

is there a link between them? these people being both roman catholic. Paris By Night 06:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Depends how you look at it. France was officially secular, the RoI at the time was officially Catholic.

Now, France was a protagonist in WW2, Ireland was officially neutral. If you are asking the question "Why an Anglo-French union and not an Irish-French union?", I think religion would certainly not have been the factor that makes or breaks the deal. France was more concerned with rebuilding flattened cities, coming to terms with frictions between the ex-collaborators and the ex-resistance, trying to avoid getting drawn into other conflicts. Not to mention they were developing a forward-looking agenda that resulted in such things as TGV, France's nuclear power generation and a large chunk of Airbus. So, I'd imagine Mollet's request was either through gratitude and a desire for the two nations to be closer, or through desparation and a notion of "safety in numbers" (I'd imagine the latter!). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.183.201 (talk) 01:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Henry II was a French noble

"From 1066 to 1214, the King of England held extensive fiefs in northern France, adding to Normandy the counties of Maine, Anjou, and Touraine, and the Duchy of Brittany." I think this part is misleading since it was the Count of Anjou that added Normandy and England to his domain, becoming "incidentaly" King of England. I'd redirect you to the Angevin Empire page for sources and details. -Chairman Meow

World War II proposal

Wasn't the WWII proposal also about preventing repercussions from the Germans over continued fighting either during or after armistice. Was it also intended to delegitimize Petain's administration? Possibly outlined as such in 'Dunkirk' by Hugh Sebag Montefiore. -maxrspct ping me 14:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Entente Cordiale?

Should we really have a section on the Entente cordiale? I don't think anyone seriously viewed it as a step towards union. 108.254.160.23 (talk) 11:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Franco-British Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070129050108/http://www.iht.com:80/articles/2007/01/17/news/letter.php to http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/17/news/letter.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: English 111 First-Semester College Composition

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2024 and 14 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ethan Vaughn (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Ethan Vaughn (talk) 00:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Questions Towards the Relevancy

Hello, I have questions regarding why it would be important to add subcategories to the history of the Scotts and France. As well as the 100-year war when England tried claiming the French crown. As I've seen, the article is labeled the Franco British Union. As Britain wasn't a country yet. I'm curious to know from others on what they see as relevant to the main article. Ethan Vaughn (talk) 02:24, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]