Talk:Francis Gleeson (priest)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Canadian Paul (talk · contribs) 20:57, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article in the near future, most on Monday, but I will be mindful of the nominator's comment that they are only able to address concerns on weekends. Canadian Paul 20:57, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Definitely meets the Good Article criteria, as there were only one or two minor issues that I fixed up myself. This is the first GA I've ever passed without putting on hold first, so congratulations and thank you for your hard work! Canadian Paul 16:28, 21 February 2012 (UTC)