Talk:Francesco Totti/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:52, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Will make a start on this soon! JAGUAR 16:52, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Checking against the GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- "In 2011, Totti was recognized by IFFHS as the most popular footballer in Europe" - recognised, if you want to stay consistent with the spelling
- "In 2015, Totti's famous selfie celebration was included amongst the goal celebrations available for FIFA 16 and Pro Evolution Soccer 2016; he also took a selfie in the official trailer of the game on YouTube" - which game is this referring to?
- "From a mental perspective, he displayed a greater responsibility for the team, and was presented with the number 10 jersey" - this sounds like his mental prowess was responsible for them presenting him with the number 10 shirt?
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No original research found.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Ref 94, ref 93, ref 112, and ref 122 are all dead. Other than that, this article looks like the best one yet! The prose is excellent, comprehensive and engaging. I couldn't find anything major at all, so once all of those minor issues are out of the way this can pass. It took me a while to read all three of those articles today—I'm exhausted! JAGUAR 16:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
@Jaguar: Issues addressed. We cleaned it up a lot since the last review. Thanks a million! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing them! This is an excellent article, so let's promote this JAGUAR 19:09, 23 November 2016 (UTC)