Talk:Framingham station/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Will211 (talk · contribs) 02:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
It is well written
[edit]the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct
and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
By the 1970s, the station had fallen into disrepair; part of the roof actually collapsed in 1978. Remove the word actually-Done
The station closed with the end of passenger service in the 1930s, and then spent some time as a branch of the Framingham Public library, and a private garage. Change sentence to spent time as a branch of the Framingham Public Library, and then spent time as a private garage.-Done
Article is now well written
Verifiable with no original research
[edit]it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
it contains no original research
it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism
Broad in its coverage
[edit]it addresses the main aspects of the topic
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
Neutral
[edit]it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
Stable
[edit]it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate
[edit]images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Overall
[edit]I have reviewed this article, and it has passed the Good Article Guidelines.