Jump to content

Talk:Framingham station/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Will211 (talk · contribs) 02:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


It is well written

[edit]

the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct

and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.


By the 1970s, the station had fallen into disrepair; part of the roof actually collapsed in 1978. Remove the word actually-Done

The station closed with the end of passenger service in the 1930s, and then spent some time as a branch of the Framingham Public library, and a private garage. Change sentence to spent time as a branch of the Framingham Public Library, and then spent time as a private garage.-Done

Article is now well written

Verifiable with no original research

[edit]

it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines

it contains no original research

it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism

Broad in its coverage

[edit]

it addresses the main aspects of the topic

it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail

Neutral

[edit]

it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

Stable

[edit]

it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate

[edit]

images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content

images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Overall

[edit]

I have reviewed this article, and it has passed the Good Article Guidelines.