Talk:Fragile (Yes album)

Mood for a Day was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 October 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Fragile (Yes album). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Progressive Rock High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Importance

If Close to the Edge is top importance, certainly Fragile is also 205.250.109.113 23:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wendy Carlos

Having just listened to Wendy Carlos' 1969 album The Well Tempered Synthsizer, I cannot help but wonder if Rick's "Cans and Brahms" is an attempt to capitalize on the Moog craze after that album and 1968's Switched-On Bach. 70.153.97.121 22:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cans and Brahms

Having just listened to Wendy Carlos' 1969 recording The Well-Tempered Synthesizer, I can't help but wonder if it and her 1968 recording Switched-On Bach, and other such albums were some of the muse behind this Yes track. I know Rick had publishing issues at that time so he solo contribution was something public domain, but S-OB triggered a Moog fad at the same time. Also, listening to Carlos' account of the making of the early recordings, it is clear this was bleeding edge technology and very labor intensive, yet the story behind CAB makes it sound like he just threw it together. Did the technology really improve that much in just two years? El charangista 11:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There might easily be a connection, but in the 1970s when we were listening to Fragile a lot, I recall no one ever saying, "This sounds just like Walter Carlos", although he was a very famous name at that time.

Synthesizers were just an integral part of the sound of progressive rock.

Was this the first classical transcription to follow Carlos? That bears some thinking about generally. But there are Janáček and Bartók songs on the first Emerson, Lake and Palmer album (1970).

Varlaam (talk) 19:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fragile.jpg

Image:Fragile.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Artwork

This is rather speculative and therefore not to be put into the article (unless you can find proof!), but I thought I'd mention it here as an interesting aside. The planet in the cover artwork of Fragile bears a striking resemblance to the planets in The Little Prince. The trees on the Fragile cover look similar to Saint Exupéry's baobab trees, which break up and destroy planets. That reminds me of the planet breaking up on the album's back cover, though that was clearly caused by war, not trees. Erusse estelinya (talk) 18:52, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We Have Heaven

I'd read, under the "production" section, that the first line of the song was, "Tell the moon dog, tell the March-hare," and noticed that there was no citation provided to prove that this was true. Also, I find this information to be somewhat superfluous, due to the fact that no other song lyrics from the album are to be found within the article; personally, I believe its addition is highly out of place, unecessary, and irrelevant.

Maybe I am missing something and these lyrics are indeed vital to the integrity of the article... Even so, if the line remains, it'd be best if someone could produce a citation proving that the referenced lyrics are correct. Thanks! ForgottenWon (talk) 13:26, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that too. It does not belong even if cited.

However, I personally don't mind it being there since for 35 years I have believed the lyric to be "Tell the moon dog, tell the marcher", whatever that means. So I will not be deleting that sentence.

This is the only Yes album I have on LP only, not CD. Why? Because it's really really pop, and because it has lines like "Tell the moon dog, tell the marcher".

These days, the standard is probably (this requires confirmation) to have a page in Wikiquote where confusing lines could be explicated with the appropriate references. Thence a link from here to Wikiquote.

Varlaam (talk) 20:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Odd to see no discussion of its original reception or sales figures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.116.31.198 (talk) 02:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fragile (Yes album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150315204844/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]