Talk:Foxes in popular culture
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Foxes in popular culture article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
New fire starter Pokemon is a fox
[edit]Look up the official new fire start for generation 6. If Ninetails is notable enough to be mentioned here, Fennekin surely is. Mrmoustache14 (talk) 02:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
How exactly is "anime" not part of the "animated" section?
[edit]Countless different varieties of animation are represented in the animation section, there is no reason for "anime" to be its own thing. 63.226.210.58 (talk) 04:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Your Asian Symbolism Is Inaccurate
[edit]Someone Wrote: "In Chinese, Japanese, and Korean folklores, foxes (huli jing in China, kitsune in Japan, and kumiho in Korea) are powerful spirits that are known for their highly mischievous and cunning nature, and they often take on the form of female humans to seduce men. In contemporary Chinese, the word "huli jing" is often used to describe a mistress negatively in an extramarital affair. In Shinto of Japan, kitsune sometimes helps people as an errand of their deity, Inari."
That's not accurate, or correct. First off, Japanese have a different version and take on the fox spirits than Chinese, and they can't be lumped together as one symbolic view. Second off, the Japanese have a neutral-to-positive view of the fox, not the negative one described in that paragraph. Third off, Japanese fox folk tales are not about seduction, they are about love, devotion, intelligence, innocence, child-like trickery, playfulness, dependance, etc... Whomever wrote that paragraph did not do any research on foxes in Japanese culture at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.167.139 (talk) 13:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Foxes in popular culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713232153/http://lorenmaciver.com/videos-foxes-jumping-on-my-trampoline-%5Bc8xJtH6UcQY%5D.cfm to http://lorenmaciver.com/videos-foxes-jumping-on-my-trampoline-%5Bc8xJtH6UcQY%5D.cfm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090702195523/http://www.freewebs.com/wolfsheadandvixen/ to http://www.freewebs.com/wolfsheadandvixen
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Dogon mythology
[edit]According to Prof Walter Van Beek, the pale fox is not a god to the Dogon people, but rather a messenger from the gods. The idea that the pale fox is a god is reported to have been a mistake made by Marcel Griaule.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kammerice (talk • contribs) 08:35, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Removal
[edit]removed :
- 110-113 - A Japanese legend:[1]Byakko helped Yamatotakeru
Yamatotakeru is not a fox, and afaict neither is Byakko.
There's a translation of scroll 7 here http://nihonshoki.wikidot.com/scroll-7-keiko-seimu - didn't find any references to this legend. 5.198.10.236 (talk) 20:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- ^ Nihon Shoki Chapter 7
Categories
[edit]Ohnoitsjamie, re your recent revert, "that's already a parent category of the existing cat", I couldn't find the "parent". Can you clarify? Its probably my ignorance, but I find the category system confusing at times. Rwood128 (talk) 00:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I find it confusing as well, and I could be wrong. If you look at Category:Animals_in_popular_culture, you'll see in the Subcategories that there is "Vertibrates in Popular Culture", which can be further expanded to Mammals --> Canines --> Foxes. My understanding is that we don't need to add parent categories of subcategories. You could imagine how unwieldy it would be if we had to backfill parent category trees for every category. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
European symbolism lacking
[edit]It could be worth mentioning the influence of "Reynard the fox" on western Europe vision of the fox, who even gave the modern word for fox in french, "renard" while it used to be "goupil" 2001:861:5DD0:5170:F5DB:D14B:C72C:5F00 (talk) 22:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- I made some mention. --Error (talk) 17:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)