Talk:Fox River (Illinois River tributary)

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Mid‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

Agree: right now, Fox Valley doesn't have enough extra information. Eventually, if this article gets too big, we could consider a split. --- hike395 12:19, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree, a bit. The content of Fox Valley should perhaps be merged here, but in the vast majority of Wisconsin, people would be surprised to learn that anyone refers to anything but the watershed of the Fox River (Wisconsin) as the "Fox Valley". :-) So...I guess what I'm saying is merge the content if you like, but regardless, Fox Valley should be a disambig if anything, not a redirect here. Tom e r ^talk 05:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then Fox Valley should redirect to Fox River, a disambig page. — goethean ॐ 15:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If that was a motion, I second. :-) Tom e r ^talk 23:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what the final outcome is, but it sounded like...

Move Fox Valley → Fox Valley (Illinois)
Create Fox Valley disambiguation page
Create Fox Valley (Wisconsin) and redirect to Fox River (Wisconsin)
Leave Fox River (Illinois) alone

Is this right? —Rob (talk) 08:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You all forget that "Fox Valley", for Illinois, is an actual region, and also a really, really, really big mall. There's no reason to merge anything, unless you're planning on splitting Fox Valley into "Fox Valley Wisconsin" and "Fox Valley Illinois." Which might make sense. -- Jazzypaul.

No one replied to me last time, so I'll take action as I indicated above, but I added a redirect to Fox River (Wisconsin). —Rob (talk) 20:46, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to make sense. Because of the relative importance of these two rivers in their respective regions there will always be some confusion. Especially as one who lives in Wisconsin on part of the 70+ miles of Illinois listed river. I added the "Wisconsin" section to reflect that, but this is probably as clear as it can be at this point. - Vdub144 7/26/06

Better idea; let's do Fox River (Illinois River tributary) as Fox River (Illinois) isn't really true attm. —Rob (talk) 19:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fox River should not be part of the same article as Fox Valley. Fox Valley is used in the Elgin area and south, where most of the population lives, but not all the way south to the confluence with the Illinois river. Most people in McHenry (whose watertower reads "Heart of the Fox") or Johnsburg, much further north, would not even recognize that term, and associate more closely with the Chain of Lakes. North of the border people would better associate with "Southeastern Wisconsin" or a county name. This article should describe the river, the whole river. It is fine to link to it from some measly article about the Fox Valley. Jim

New "Flooding" section addition

That new section is not encyclopedic, but I think that it should be fixed/worked on rather than deleted. It (except for wp:undue on material on that that one building) looks like good/valid subjects for the article. North8000 (talk) 01:29, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It has gotten worse and about 10 years later is still unsourced and has had unsourced additions. I might try to add sourced material or else might delete the section. North8000 (talk) 16:23, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I tried researching and realized that it's sort of a fool's errand. Every river floods, and being over 200 miles long with various dams and lakes you can't generalize and say that "the river" flooded. And there's nothing noteworthy / non-routine in the content. I'm going to delete the section. North8000 (talk) 17:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fox River (Illinois River tributary). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66gupqQDM?url=http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ to http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]